True that Kerry has to stay in Iraq because if he pulls it it will cause an uproar. But Kerry looked at the very same intelligence Bush looked at and even backed Bush....for going after Saddam the weapons. Kerry would have taken longer in the U.N. though...even though Bush took it to the U.N. and for a long time did nothing at all to help...like usual...This was important to go to war, if Saddam had the weapons and was a threat. Bush had and has nothing against Iraq like all you claim. That makes 0 sense. Bush looked at the intelligence, and obviously the intelligence was very clear and said it was right, and if the intelligence said it was right...why would he disagree with it?
Kerry is staying in Iraq because he has too. It's too late to pull out without causing a huge uproar and problem. Kerry is NOT a war president, because had Kerry (or anyone with any sort of intelegence) been in office, we would not have blindly rushed into Iraq while ignoring the real threat of Osama Bin Laden. Bush was just anxious for revenge and wanted to attack the first country that came to his mind that was "bad". Of course, this was Iraq.
It's not surprising when you remember who is dad. I believe Bush WANTED to go into Iraq before he even came into office, I believe he held a grudge because of his father. Why else would he invade Iraq? The excuse of "I got a report from britain saying they have them, so instead of investigating further, I am sending on a full scale attack, despite the fact that the UN WEAPON INSPECTORS keep telling me they have nothing" is bullshit. It's just that, an excuse.
I bet when he heard about the twin towers going down, the first thing in his mind was "Okay, how can I relate this too Iraq in order to invade them." Of course, this is just speculation, but I find it very convinient that he waited untill our country was attacked to go to war with Iraq, and that it was after the attack on America that all this information about Iraq having "WMD's" surfaced.
To summerize, Bush took the first opportunity that arose to invade a country, based on the intelgence of another country, he didn't take the time to use our own intelegence to investigate whether or not Iraq did actually have WMD's, like he should have, considering that the intelgence that said there was a 100% chance of Iraq having WMD's was hugely wrong.
Kerry, I think, would have taken the extra time to look at this, and investigate to see whether or not there actually WAS WMD's there, and base his conclusion on something OTHER then what another country says.