Originally posted by Darth Revan
Well SG... remember that Nirvana were the biggest band at the time of Kurt's death, so you can't really say that they were much different from the bands they play on the radio/TV now. Obviously they were better, but my point still stands.Rock is not dead, if anything it's more alive than it ever has been. They say rock is a way of rebelling, well, since when did rebels watch MTV? IMO it's almost better this way, so that not every dumbass jock with a shower radio can sing along with Trent Reznor.
Hense my reasoning for saying this:
Originally posted by Samurai Guy
There are the odd example of bands that are musicians for the right reasons, but it is very seldom. Half the reason if I am listening to the radio, it is on my local Classical Station.
I understand your viewpoint. Radio is rebellious. I am just a little aggrovated that in order to hear the aforementioned 'rebellious' rock I am forced to listen to one station and one station only, and that is after midnight.
Music is rebellious... that is what it is supposed to be in my opinion. An ability to say what you want when you want. The meaning of music is lost.
I agree with your "dumbass jock" remark. And it was amusing as well.