Zell Miller Speaks at Republican convention

Started by Creechuur9 pages

Zell Miller Speaks at Republican convention

Holy crap, did anyone catch this speech? He ripped Kerry a new one. He ripped the upper echelons of the Democratic party a new one...and he's a Democrat! I've always thought Zell was a good apple, but he blew me away with his speech.

I'll bet he just cost Kerry the Presidency...if he had any chance of winning it in the first place. One things for sure, I didn't see any Republicans talking crap about their own at the democratic convention.

Text of speech by Democratic Sen. Zell Miller of Georgia as prepared for delivery Wednesday at the Republican National Convention:

___

Since I last stood in this spot, a whole new generation of the Miller Family has been born: Four great grandchildren.

Along with all the other members of our close-knit family, they are my and Shirley's most precious possessions.

And I know that's how you feel about your family also. Like you, I think of their future, the promises and the perils they will face.

Like you, I believe that the next four years will determine what kind of world they will grow up in.

And like you, I ask which leader is it today that has the vision, the willpower and, yes, the backbone to best protect my family?

The clear answer to that question has placed me in this hall with you tonight. For my family is more important than my party.

There is but one man to whom I am willing to entrust their future and that man's name is George Bush.

In the summer of 1940, I was an 8-year-old boy living in a remote little Appalachian valley. Our country was not yet at war, but even we children knew that there were some crazy men across the ocean who would kill us if they could.

President Roosevelt, in his speech that summer, told America "all private plans, all private lives, have been in a sense repealed by an overriding public danger."

In 1940, Wendell Wilkie was the Republican nominee.

And there is no better example of someone repealing their "private plans" than this good man. He gave Roosevelt the critical support he needed for a peacetime draft, an unpopular idea at the time.

And he made it clear that he would rather lose the election than make national security a partisan campaign issue.

Shortly before Wilkie died, he told a friend, that if he could write his own epitaph and had to choose between "here lies a president" or "here lies one who contributed to saving freedom," he would prefer the latter.

Where are such statesmen today?

Where is the bipartisanship in this country when we need it most?

Now, while young Americans are dying in the sands of Iraq and the mountains of Afghanistan, our nation is being torn apart and made weaker because of the Democrat's manic obsession to bring down our Commander in Chief.

What has happened to the party I've spent my life working in?

I can remember when Democrats believed that it was the duty of America to fight for freedom over tyranny.

It was Democratic President Harry Truman who pushed the Red Army out of Iran, who came to the aid of Greece when Communists threatened to overthrow it, who stared down the Soviet blockade of West Berlin by flying in supplies and saving the city.

Time after time in our history, in the face of great danger, Democrats and Republicans worked together to ensure that freedom would not falter. But not today.

Motivated more by partisan politics than by national security, today's Democratic leaders see America as an occupier, not a liberator.

And nothing makes this Marine madder than someone calling American troops occupiers rather than liberators.

Tell that to the one-half of Europe that was freed because Franklin Roosevelt led an army of liberators, not occupiers.

Tell that to the lower half of the Korean Peninsula that is free because Dwight Eisenhower commanded an army of liberators, not occupiers.

Tell that to the half a billion men, women and children who are free today from the Baltics to the Crimea, from Poland to Siberia, because Ronald Reagan rebuilt a military of liberators, not occupiers.

Never in the history of the world has any soldier sacrificed more for the freedom and liberty of total strangers than the American soldier. And, our soldiers don't just give freedom abroad, they preserve it for us here at home.

For it has been said so truthfully that it is the soldier, not the reporter, who has given us the freedom of the press. It is the soldier, not the poet, who has given us freedom of speech.

It is the soldier, not the agitator, who has given us the freedom to protest.

It is the soldier who salutes the flag, serves beneath the flag, whose coffin is draped by the flag, who gives that protester the freedom to abuse and burn that flag.

No one should dare to even think about being the Commander in Chief of this country if he doesn't believe with all his heart that our soldiers are liberators abroad and defenders of freedom at home.

But don't waste your breath telling that to the leaders of my party today. In their warped way of thinking America is the problem, not the solution.

They don't believe there is any real danger in the world except that which America brings upon itself through our clumsy and misguided foreign policy.

(cont.)

(cont.)

It is not their patriotism — it is their judgment that has been so sorely lacking. They claimed Carter's pacifism would lead to peace.

They were wrong.

They claimed Reagan's defense buildup would lead to war.

They were wrong.

And, no pair has been more wrong, more loudly, more often than the two Senators from Massachusetts, Ted Kennedy and John Kerry.

Together, Kennedy/Kerry have opposed the very weapons system that won the Cold War and that is now winning the War on Terror.

Listing all the weapon systems that Senator Kerry tried his best to shut down sounds like an auctioneer selling off our national security but Americans need to know the facts.

The B-1 bomber, that Senator Kerry opposed, dropped 40 percent of the bombs in the first six months of Operation Enduring Freedom.

The B-2 bomber, that Senator Kerry opposed, delivered air strikes against the Taliban in Afghanistan and Hussein's command post in Iraq.

The F-14A Tomcats, that Senator Kerry opposed, shot down Khadifi's Libyan MIGs over the Gulf of Sidra. The modernized F-14D, that Senator Kerry opposed, delivered missile strikes against Tora Bora.

The Apache helicopter, that Senator Kerry opposed, took out those Republican Guard tanks in Kuwait in the Gulf War. The F-15 Eagles, that Senator Kerry opposed, flew cover over our Nation's Capital and this very city after 9/11.

I could go on and on and on: against the Patriot Missile that shot down Saddam Hussein's scud missiles over Israel; against the Aegis air-defense cruiser; against the Strategic Defense Initiative; against the Trident missile; against, against, against.

This is the man who wants to be the Commander in Chief of our U.S. Armed Forces?

U.S. forces armed with what? Spitballs?

Twenty years of votes can tell you much more about a man than twenty weeks of campaign rhetoric.

Campaign talk tells people who you want them to think you are. How you vote tells people who you really are deep inside.

Senator Kerry has made it clear that he would use military force only if approved by the United Nations.

Kerry would let Paris decide when America needs defending.

I want Bush to decide.

John Kerry, who says he doesn't like outsourcing, wants to outsource our national security.

That's the most dangerous outsourcing of all. This politician wants to be leader of the free world.

Free for how long?

For more than 20 years, on every one of the great issues of freedom and security, John Kerry has been more wrong, more weak and more wobbly than any other national figure.

As a war protester, Kerry blamed our military.

As a Senator, he voted to weaken our military. And nothing shows that more sadly and more clearly than his vote this year to deny protective armor for our troops in harms way, far away.

George Bush understands that we need new strategies to meet new threats.

John Kerry wants to re-fight yesterday's war. George Bush believes we have to fight today's war and be ready for tomorrow's challenges. George Bush is committed to providing the kind of forces it takes to root out terrorists.

No matter what spider hole they may hide in or what rock they crawl under.

George Bush wants to grab terrorists by the throat and not let them go to get a better grip.

From John Kerry, they get a "yes-no-maybe" bowl of mush that can only encourage our enemies and confuse our friends.

I first got to know George Bush when we served as governors together. I admire this man. I am moved by the respect he shows the first lady, his unabashed love for his parents and his daughters, and the fact that he is unashamed of his belief that God is not indifferent to America.

I can identify with someone who has lived that line in "Amazing Grace," "Was blind, but now I see," and I like the fact that he's the same man on Saturday night that he is on Sunday morning.

He is not a slick talker but he is a straight shooter and, where I come from, deeds mean a lot more than words.

I have knocked on the door of this man's soul and found someone home, a God-fearing man with a good heart and a spine of tempered steel.

The man I trust to protect my most precious possession: my family.

This election will change forever the course of history, and that's not any history. It's our family's history.

The only question is how. The answer lies with each of us. And, like many generations before us, we've got some hard choosing to do.

Right now the world just cannot afford an indecisive America. Fainthearted self-indulgence will put at risk all we care about in this world.

In this hour of danger our President has had the courage to stand up. And this Democrat is proud to stand up with him.

Thank you.

God Bless this great country and God Bless George W. Bush.

"Zell". What a dumb name. He made some good points, but his name is Zell...therefore I can't take him seriously. That sounds like some wierd anime character or something.

Anyways, all these conventions are dumb, I could care less about them. The only good thing I've seen from either of them is Arnold calling people "economic girly men", that was great, just the kind of attitude you want a governor to have.

It dosent matter what they say, George Bush isnt winning, end of story.

Slipknot> so sure of ourselves, are we?

As for the speech by Mr. Miller, i was enamored of this Democrat, (who, by the way, was also my governor) who shot down Kerry and the DNC. With Zell Miller and John McCain on our side, we should get at least a sizeable, but small, portion of the democratic votes. I loved his speech. Makes me proud to be a Bushican.

RNC just boosted Bush at least 8% on the demorats 😂 Kerry is toast.... 😂 before they went in Bush was leading 51 to 49 and now he's gotta be leading by way more. 😂

Dude.... talk about rounding the issue and going after his name 😛 the guy just made everyone speechless 😂

That speech damn near brought tears to my eyes.

It is precisely the reason why I hate John Kerry with a passion, and I think all the people who would support him "just because he isn't Bush" are complete and utter morons.

I don't care what the few members on this site from Europe have to say about our elections, because it isn't their country. They can worry about their own namby pamby leader.

A terrorist attack on the US the scale of 9/11 while Kerry is in power would completely destroy our country...and we would be stuck lying around on our backs like a turtle.

Our economy was ready for a downturn regardless of who the president currently is. Anyone with any understanding of economics understands the economic cycle. Back in the early 1900s the United States would have 2 or 3 years of increased economy, followed by several (5-8) years of economic downfall. We had our years of increase, now it's time for the slight downfall.

The only good thing about the US economy is that the number of years that we've suffered for each downfall has steadily decreased since the 1930s.

Originally posted by Linkalicious
That speech damn near brought tears to my eyes.

It is precisely the reason why I hate John Kerry with a passion, and I think all the people who would support him "just because he isn't Bush" are complete and utter morons.

I don't care what the few members on this site from Europe have to say about our elections, because it isn't their country. They can worry about their own namby pamby leader.

A terrorist attack on the US the scale of 9/11 while Kerry is in power would completely destroy our country...and we would be stuck lying around on our backs like a turtle.

Our economy was ready for a downturn regardless of who the president currently is. Anyone with any understanding of economics understands the economic cycle. Back in the early 1900s the United States would have 2 or 3 years of increased economy, followed by several (5-8) years of economic downfall. We had our years of increase, now it's time for the slight downfall.

The only good thing about the US economy is that the number of years that we've suffered for each downfall has steadily decreased since the 1930s.

Exactly thumbsup That is how the free market cycle works and everything is operating as it is suppose to.

not to mention our economy is growing even though a war is waging and we have been attacked on the scale never seen before. for all that is happening i am surprised we are actually recovering.

I know Southern California contract companies made over 30 billion dollars from government defense contracts alone due to this war.

Of course, that's minor when you compare it to the amount he spent on the war, but that's money spent by the government within the country. Stuff like that is precisely why we have the world's largest gross domestic product.

✅ war is actually good for our economy 😄 because we are the worlds leader in arms sales 😛 followed by Russian yard sales 😄

South Cali was once the hub of aircraft manufacture 🙁

you know Zel MIller kept talking about how Kerry was "flip-flopping" and all that shit, well did you know in 2001 Zel Miller actually called kerry a good leader and praised him....and not to mention Zel Miller helped put all those "leaders of the democratic party" into office in the first place....talk about flip-flops.

Originally posted by 113
you know Zel MIller kept talking about how Kerry was "flip-flopping" and all that shit, well did you know in 2001 Zel Miller actually called kerry a good leader and praised him....and not to mention Zel Miller helped put all those "leaders of the democratic party" into office in the first place....talk about flip-flops.

❌ you do not understand that he actually endorsed Clinton in 1992 at the DNC convention but Clinton totally lied about his agenda... so did Kerry at the time. Miller has had the same philosophy for all of his career the Democrats changed not him.

No i didn't know it, and I'd love to see an article or some reference as to when and where he made that remark about John Kerry.

Did you not just read what Kreechur wrote? YES, he is a Democrate, YES he helped put them where they are, and NOW he see's their "vision" of the future of America....and even the man that put those people there doesn't trust them....

Sounds like he's looking out for what's BEST for his family...

Interesting speech, now to just find out who actually wrote it 🙄

😂 most politicians do not wite there own speeches these days 😛

Well duh 😛 although I suppose compared to others it did sound impressive, although a bit cocky, the whole thing about American soldiers being the best 😛

Any person who is willing to sacrifice themselves for the greater good is the best in my books, not just the Americans 🥷

I agree with you about that Silv, i think he just narrowed in on Americans because he was looking for that whole sentimental "American Unity" thing....

yes they don't write their own but they have to approve of what was written in the speech. I thought it was amazing and I think he will help put Bush back in the office for another four years

i didn't read what creechur wrote, but i watched the speech last night (i've been watching all the speeches) and the democrats vision of america is one where we're not viewed as war-mongers and arrogant assholes around the world. A future where working people will actually get the help they need. A future where waging a war doesn't becomes the only issue dealt with by the government.
You know throughout this whole damn convention i've heard 1 major speaker talk about something other than the dam war. Give us a break already. Every two seconds all i hear is "war...freedom....leadership...resolve....bush....war....our childrens safety" and all this crap....first off it's interesting to see people living in the middle of nowhere land talkin about wanting to be safe when they're not the ones who are going to ever be attacked!....We're the ones who got attacked. WE suffered, WE are the ones who should be talking about safety. Not some republicans from texas, idaho, etc who've never even been to new york.
And second the republicans obviously have no other issues they wish to discuss or bring attention to because they know that in any other issue the democratics would rip them apart. It's all a damn campaign strategy to make Bush not seem like an idiot. If all Bush talks about in his speech tonight is the war and safety and freedom, i'm just gonna rip my hair out. A president is a president because he's supposed to serve all americans and all aspects of american life, not just be commander and chief of the military, people need to realize this.

Originally posted by trav6612
yes they don't write their own but they have to approve of what was written in the speech. I thought it was amazing and I think he will help put Bush back in the office for another four years