and Boba Fett wasnt casted to be an amateur. Why do you think they had him as the man who would capture Han Solo. They brought 5 other bounty hunters on the Executor. Any one of them couldve captured Han Solo but they didnt. Fett did. None of the others had the respect Vader had for Fett.
Come on, you’re inventing stuff. I’m beginning to wonder if you saw Star Wars ? Vader respected Fett ?! I think I missed that scene. Vader isn’t the respecting kind.
Oh, and I also don’t recall Fett “capturing” Han Solo. In “The Empire strikes back” they were eating (or something like that) and Darth Vader walked in, and before you know it, they were all under arrest. End of story. I’m sure Boba Fett tracked down a damaged Millenium Falcon, but that’s about it. And when he has a chance to fight, a half blind Solo manages to humiliate him.
who?-kid show me where George Lucas specifically says that he didnt expect to make a trilogy.
I agree, he never said it, at least, not in so many words. But how do you explain that Obi did not recognize R2-D2 in the very first movie ? How do you explain the crush Luke and Leia had on each other ? How do you explain that the original title was just “Star Wars”, and not “Episode IV : a new hope ?” How do you explain Vader tries to kill Luke, and in the next movie, he wants to rule the universe with his “beloved” son ? Why does some general (or admiral) talk to Vader about “your sad devotion to that ancient religion (ancient ? religion ? It is old, yeah, very old, but he was very clearly speaking like the Force/Jedi’s/Siths were something from a long long time ago).
The answer is extremely simple : because George Lucas didn’t have a clue sequels and prequels would see the light, that’s why !! It is a very known fact that nobody believed Star Wars was going to be so successful. So why would he bother writing stories for prequels and sequels ? The first movie, Star Wars, didn’t have a cliffhanger ending, the story was told, the rebels had won, and the young farmer boy had saved the princess and the universe. In 1977, before the launch of Star Wars, he held a private screening of the movie, and almost nobody liked it. Some even said it was the worst film in the history of cinema.
But once he realized he hit the jackpot, he made it seem it was all part of a masterplan, and started writing his sequels. I say sequels, not prequels, because he only started to write these a few years before “The Phantom Menace”.
I don't know why you find it hard to accept these known facts. If Boba Fett was intended to play an important part in the nine movies, why was he killed (after a stupid non-convincing fight) in the desert ? Why does he have sooo little screentime ? Why isn't his name even mentioned in "The empire strikes back" ?
Again the same answer : Georgie boy didn't know BF was to become a cult figure, so he didn't care that much. He just let him die. Later he realized BF was indeed very popular, and he tried to sneak in the character in the prequel (Attack of the Clones) to please the fans. And in the comics and novels, suddenly BF survived and came out as one of the most dangerous men alive. But again, no "grand scheme" originally intended for Boba Fett.
I'm done arguing. I've given lots of reasons why BF isn't in the same league as Venom, why he's overrated and why he wasn't originally the man he would become. If you don't believe me, fine.
"I find your lack of faith disturbing."-Darth Kid