Originally posted by BackFire
She deserves to die for doing something like that. What a bad person she is. You don't just rip a guys nuts off because you think he may be cheating on you. Perhaps if you were a guy you would understand where I'm coming from with this.. May death find her slowly and painfully.And no, dyke wasn't mean to be an insult obviously, because we all know what a flattering word it is. Perhaps dyke isn't the right word though....Bulldyke...that's a bit more fitting. She must be pretty strong if she is able to yank off her husbands testicles. She probably looks like Rosie O'Donnel, but with more facial hair and a smaller dick. I'm sure all the other bulldyke feminazi's everywhere are all loving the fact that she ripped her husbands nuts off for no good reason, and that's what pisses me off more then anything.
"Oh yeah, wow, what a lesbian she must be for ripping husbands testicals off."
Uh...yeah, actually that's very correct. I know it was meant to be sarcastic, but sarcasm is often used to point out the idiocy of something someone has said by taking what they say and wording it in a way that makes it sound overly dumb. It doesn't work if you just basically simplify what I already insinuated, just makes it sound as if you're agreeing with me. Anyways, that's your lesson in Sarcasm 101 for today. You're homework is to make one plausable and valid sarcastic remark that actually works the way it's meant to. Off you go.
Just because you use sarcasm to insult people doesnt mean everyone else does. I am way above that, no need to insult or put you down in any way. I also passed the stage of thinking about having a discussion of different interests with you, because you immensly contradict yourself. Therefore i have no wish to redicule you in my posts because your own posts do that anyway.
What you said was just absolutely uncalled for. She should die? Shes a dyke?
You'll find that that is rather offencive, calling someone who has done something terrible to someone a dyke! Re-read and re-think your post.
You saying she should die, did not set me off one bit i coulnt care less what you say, Its good that noone with some kind of authority has that kind of attitude, but you calling her a dyke because of the terrble thing shes done is extreamly offencive!
"Just because you use sarcasm to insult people doesnt mean everyone else does. I am way above that, no need to insult or put you down in any way. I also passed the stage of thinking about having a discussion of different interests with you, because you immensly contradict yourself. Therefore i have no wish to redicule you in my posts because your own posts do that anyway."
Newsflash: That's the whole point of using sarcasm, to weaken someone elses statement by showing how unsound and silly it is. It's done for argumentative methods, and entertainment methods. When I use it, it's used for both purposes, humor and argumentative. My philosophy is - If you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all...unless that "anything" is extremely funny. So, if you don't like the purpose of sarcasm, don't use it, because you're using it poorly.
"What you said was just absolutely uncalled for. She should die? Shes a dyke?
You'll find that that is rather offencive, calling someone who has done something terrible to someone a dyke! Re-read and re-think your post."
Yeah, dyke was uncalled for, that's why I changed it to Bulldyke, if you remember. When I said Bulldyke, I meant nothing having to do with her sexuality, I meant that she was probably a large, ogrelike woman, not unlike Rosie O'Donnel, who probably is quite manish and ugly. Yes, this is pure speculation on my part, but I simply can't imagine a dainty normal looking woman ripping off someones nuts.
"You saying she should die, did not set me off one bit i coulnt care less what you say, Its good that noone with some kind of authority has that kind of attitude, but you calling her a dyke because of the terrble thing shes done is extreamly offencive!"
Ohhhh noooo, BF said something offencive, to the extream! Yeah, like I've never said anything offensive before. The only reason you find that offencive is because you're a female and the term relates to females. Anyone who is offended by anything they read on the internet deserves to be offended. It's just a word, get over it.
Also, care to elaborate on these so called "immense contradictions"? From what I can remember you've only pointed a contradiction out one time, and I shot that too the ground with incredible ease, since it was unfounded and incorrect. So, please, inform me of these contradictions.
http://www.angelfire.com/hero/supersteak0/
Here is a picture of what I consider a Bulldyke. For all we know this is the woman who ripped off the mans nuts.
Originally posted by BackFire
"Just because you use sarcasm to insult people doesnt mean everyone else does. I am way above that, no need to insult or put you down in any way. I also passed the stage of thinking about having a discussion of different interests with you, because you immensly contradict yourself. Therefore i have no wish to redicule you in my posts because your own posts do that anyway."Newsflash: That's the whole point of using sarcasm, to weaken someone elses statement by showing how unsound and silly it is. It's done for argumentative methods, and entertainment methods. When I use it, it's used for both purposes, humor and argumentative. My philosophy is - If you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all...unless that "anything" is extremely funny. So, if you don't like the purpose of sarcasm, don't use it, because you're using it poorly.
"What you said was just absolutely uncalled for. She should die? Shes a dyke?
You'll find that that is rather offencive, calling someone who has done something terrible to someone a dyke! Re-read and re-think your post."
Yeah, dyke was uncalled for, that's why I changed it to Bulldyke, if you remember. When I said Bulldyke, I meant nothing having to do with her sexuality, I meant that she was probably a large, ogrelike woman, not unlike Rosie O'Donnel, who probably is quite manish and ugly. Yes, this is pure speculation on my part, but I simply can't imagine a dainty normal looking woman ripping off someones nuts.
"You saying she should die, did not set me off one bit i coulnt care less what you say, Its good that noone with some kind of authority has that kind of attitude, but you calling her a dyke because of the terrble thing shes done is extreamly offencive!"
Ohhhh noooo, BF said something offencive, to the extream! Yeah, like I've never said anything offensive before. The only reason you find that offencive is because you're a female and the term relates to females. Anyone who is offended by anything they read on the internet deserves to be offended. It's just a word, get over it.
Also, care to elaborate on these so called "immense contradictions"? From what I can remember you've only pointed a contradiction out one time, and I shot that too the ground with incredible ease, since it was unfounded and incorrect. So, please, inform me of these contradictions.
I dont have the time to go through all the posts to find the contradictions, but you contradict yourself when it comes to goths, when it comes to death penalty, when it comes to drugs, to gun owning...etc. etc...it was just a general comment!
Everyone who gets offended on the internet deserves to be offended, its just a word huh? So then why do you edit people's posts, and close threads which say contain offencive words and context? Please inform me of why?
And, no actually, im not offended because im a female, i dont relate to dyke, since i am not a homosexual, however, i know i would be offended if i was gay and you said that! Wow, you changed it, well good for you, at the time when i was reading it, it sure as hell said ''dyke''
Would you or Linkalicious be offedned or any other american if i said: ''Wow, those terrorosts are killing people all arround the world, what Americans they are!'' Would you? Maybe not, i do apologise to other Americans who read this and are offended, this is only an example.
And again, when someone says offencive things to other peope you are allowed to call them an idiot, yet when you do it, ots overreaction from everyone else. Here is an example of another of your contradictions!
Originally posted by Jedi Priestess
It should be noted that there has been much complaining by men in this thread that the woman should be shot for what she did but yet no mention whatsoever what punishment the man should recieve for his infidelity..........curious this is. Speaking as a woman who has had a husband cheat on her I'd say he got off lucky. If I could have managed it without prosecution I'd have removed more of my ex's anatomy than just his balls.
😂 !!
If you honestly think this man deserved even 10% of what he got, you are wrong. Hell, I wouldn't care if she shot him in the knee, but pulling his testicles out!?! 😖