Villain For Spider-Man 3?

it should be venom and carnage and about the time thing that could be settled if they make the movie 2 and a half - 3 hours

they take 30 mins to introduce eddie and the symbiote then in the next 45mins spidey beats venom and eddie is in jail. then later the show peter watching the news and hear about eddie escaping with cletus and an explanation on cletus.

then they show spiderman patroling when his jumped by carnage & venom, venom introduces carnage as his spawn.

carnage turns on venom this part takes 15mins.

thats 1 and a half hours so far.

the 3 characters fight for a while until carnage beats them both
so venom and spidey team up (showin the value of team work)

then in the end they fight at a rocket launch site venom grabs carnage and the rocket sounds tearing the sybiotes from the hosts

spidey then webs them to the rocket and theyre launched into space

as for brock and cletus there behind bars and then it shows peter marring mj

and about kiding venom up i doubt theyll do that if they use symbiotes
because theyll loose more fans/veiwers doing that

Originally posted by Ultimate Hulk43
Besides,it's a PG-13 film.If adults hear that Venom is really scary in the movie,why bring your child to see the movie anyway if you think they'll cry?Because they are idiots,that's why.I don't think that Venom should be kid-i-fied just so babies can watch it,if he's to scary,oh well,that's their problem,not ours.The ACTUAL fans shouldn't suffer because of a few whiny brats.

exactly, that is THEIR problem, and the actual film should not be toned down. sam raimi will tone the movie down; you see spiderman childrens story books but why not a batman begins childrens story book???

IM BACK LOL wow the writing is really big what happened?

Originally posted by Silverstein
exactly, that is THEIR problem, and the actual film should not be toned down. sam raimi will tone the movie down; you see spiderman childrens story books but why not a batman begins childrens story book???

I can see it now.

Venom:*to human*I won't absorb you...Give me a hug!
Woman: Sure!Let's go out on a date.
Venom:I love shrimp.

😆 😆

... wow weird

Originally posted by Ultimate Hulk43
Besides,it's a PG-13 film.If adults hear that Venom is really scary in the movie,why bring your child to see the movie anyway if you think they'll cry?Because they are idiots,that's why.I don't think that Venom should be kid-i-fied just so babies can watch it,if he's to scary,oh well,that's their problem,not ours.The ACTUAL fans shouldn't suffer because of a few whiny brats.

I think Raimi is gonna cause a HUUUUUGE uprisal if he doesn't deliver Venom. Even if he doesn't like Venom, if he's as big of a Spider-Man fan as he claims, he should know that he's incredibly popular and loved. He's got 2 good movies to build up this one so he's at a peak, he can either climb some more or take a giant leap off. If he "kidifies" it, every true fan will be pissed off, and he's stated before that he wants to stay true to characters and you know, make it for the Spider-Man fan.

Originally posted by NoFate007
I think Raimi is gonna cause a HUUUUUGE uprisal if he doesn't deliver Venom. Even if he doesn't like Venom, if he's as big of a Spider-Man fan as he claims, he should know that he's incredibly popular and loved. He's got 2 good movies to build up this one so he's at a peak, he can either climb some more or take a giant leap off. If he "kidifies" it, every true fan will be pissed off, and he's stated before that he wants to stay true to characters and you know, make it for the Spider-Man fan.

sometimes I wonder if Raimi really is a spidey fan. seriously. so what if he got a spiderman painting as a birthday present. His spidey movies arent terrible but they could be way better.

well I think he should not put venom in spidy 3

Originally posted by spencerspider
well I think he should not put venom in spidy 3

Don't worry he won't 😉

hope not, it would ruin the movies. save him for last. Spiderman 6 baby lol

Spidey 6.. Good Lord, you people like to plan ahead.. I see it now.. May 29, 2007: 'Villains for Spider-Man 5 announced thread'. lol So what have I missed in my week absense? I saw some posters for Sandman and Electro. What's the deal?( Ock, I'm looking at you).

That was a fan poster.

Yes I know.. I read the post. But what's been going on? I've been trying to catch up on EVERYTHING here..

Nothings going on.

Just the usual speculation.

Curses.. Ah well, I want Sandman and Electro, cause Venom would be a stretch. But, if they do take the series on to 6, Venom will show up.

yes 6 is good. you can have many villains and plenty of time to do it

Nobody knows what's going on. Best resources say Venom and Sandman with a possible GG2 cameo. Who knows for sure?

All I know is that everyone is getting so bent out of shape and stuff, and this lag of news is killing us all. They should just tell us. Then we can start arguing about who was right and who was wrong. Allow a few days of retarded conversation, then everyone will argue about the plot. After we know the basic plot then its Spider-Man 4 - which some have gotten a headstart on.

With SM4 comes "if they do a 4th, is there a 5 and a 6?" and so the cycle continues.

Wouldn't that be funny if there was no villain? Parker facing "double the trouble" means he's got his taxes due AND he forgot that he left the oven on?

Sadly I can see that happening after that whole chocolate cake thing going on...never thought I'd be able to say "did you see the chocolate cake scene in Spider-Man 2?" lol

lol wow some of that is true

All of it is true. NoFate's like our resident philosopher. He understands the cycle of things on here, as do other observant posters.