Does any1 here think that the 1st was way better than the other 2 ?

Originally posted by pr1983
for revolutions read this:

http://www.paraseek.com/reviews/matrix3.html

hes got a couple of things wronmg but imo is generally right.

as for what i said earlier, my apologies, by sequels i meant revolutions, i actually thought reloaded was pretty decent, but still nowhere near the quality of the firsty movie

I stopped reading it after the first couple of lines. You can think it isn't that good of film and don't like it, but in no way shape or form is it even close to being one of the worst movies of all time. When he started saying that, that just proved to me he did not get it one bit. It looks like he is confusing a big dissapointment with a horrible movie, because he had an ewok crossed out also on the page and metioned " forget Lucas", which I take it as he is a prequel basher and thought they were horrible. Again just shows he has no f'n clue what he is talking about, the prequels aren't as good as ANH or ESB, but in no way are they close to being a horrible movie. ON top of that, he has never watched the Animatrix, cause if he did he would've known why the Kid was shown as a hero in Revolutions, and he was complaining about them cheering that the war is over. They're miles down below where the machines are and they have no way to jack into the matrix to see what has changed. But when you have been constantly fighting the machines for 100 years, in their mind, and along comes a guy who is promised to stop the war and save humankind, wouldn't you think that when thousands of sentinels suddenly stop attacking and go away, when Neo is said to be going to the Machine city, would mean the war was over?

yeah the guy went a bit overboard, some stuff was ridiculous, but some of his points i thought were very valid, i have the animatrix, but thats no excuse to just stick him(the kid) in the movie, cos a lot of people havent bought it, so there sayin to themselves who the f**k is this kid? using a game and the animatrix to further the story was a bad idea period, they should have left them as seperate threads, not tried to intertwine them with the movie. your right about the war thing, but it still doesnt make revolutions anywhere near as good as the original.

basically this thread should die a horrible death 😐

i agree

Wow...What happened to this place? I remember back in the day when threads were...Half intelligent.

Yes! I loved the first two Matrix movies. I hated the second two. It was such a great premise, and they ruined it.

1st is classic. 2nd is hmm...commercial 🙄

Originally posted by JediHDM
i agree

i feel loved 😱

Originally posted by star22
Yes! I loved the first two Matrix movies. I hated the second two. It was such a great premise, and they ruined it.

I missed the fourth? Or are you counting the Animatrix?

yeah, thats what i thought...i am assuming that he/she is counting the Animatrix, otherwise, i am totally confused...

👽 I like all of the matrix trilogy their is nothing wrong with all of them except trinity dying near the end.

this thread sucks *kills it by smashing it with a giant sledgehammer*

way to tell anyone who hadn't seen them all the ending

the movie has been out for a year now, if they haven't seen it by now, i would hope that they aren't here.

The first one was undoubtfully the best of the three films or should i say two. I think alot of people forget that reloaded and revolutions are the same movie, which is why they dont like the third that much. I liked all of them. The character development in the film is some of the best you can get in any movies. The acting is appropriate. the dialogue is amazing, even if at times they elaborate on things a little to long or not enough. the action is balanced in the best possible way. each film takes on it's own style. for me it is the character development and content that make these movies a favorite for me. The first is defenantly the best though, but then again when it comes to sequals it is near impossible to find a sequal that is better than the original. reloaded and revolutions as a single movie do rival the original matrix though, it is when you break reloaded and revolutions into two movies, when it seems to be lacking.

One thing that really bugs me is how people say Keeanu didn't show any emotion in his face and didnt' act that good in the sequels for that reason, yet a lot of people say Christian Bale played the part awesome in Equilibrium where he showed no emotion and just had a stone face throughout the first half of the movie. While I agree Bale's performance was good, Keeanu's wasn't any worse, he played Neo perfectly, but because so many people have something against him, they of course thought it was horrible.

can you imagine will smith playing neo ugh 😘

yeah, or Val Kilmer as Morpheus? He's a good actor, but I just cannot see him playing Morpheus. And what about Sean Connery? I think he would've been cool, but I don't think he would've fit the movie that well.

i actually like keanu, but come on, he aint the most articulate actor.

anyway, he did a decent job in the matrix, because the character suited him, except for the "you could have just asked" line to seraph, very bill and ted

Originally posted by cal31
yeah, or Val Kilmer as Morpheus? He's a good actor, but I just cannot see him playing Morpheus. And what about Sean Connery? I think he would've been cool, but I don't think he would've fit the movie that well.

i think sean could've pulled off the architect. "i created the matrixsssshhhh.."

okay maybe not...

and val kilmer as morpheus? did they actually consider him or are you making a "worst cae possible" scene..?