Strength vs Invulnerability

Started by Krissy Von Doom2 pages

Strength vs Invulnerability

Would it be more useful to have the strength of the Hulk with the vulnerabilities of a normal human

or

the invulnerability of the Juggernaut with the strength of a normal human?

id say invulnerablenessisity.......ness cause no 1 cud kill u u cud just go buy sum guns and no1 cud kill u but with the strength of the hulk u can just get shot

Gotta go with the invaunrability, lets face it all the strength in the world won't help if you get shot in the face.

The Invulnerability would be awsome , I would just jump off buildings for the fun of it.

Hulk strength without invulnerability would be terrible. You'd lose your temper, hit a wall, and break every bone in your hand.

The Invulnerability would be awsome , I would just jump off buildings for the fun of it.
Invulnerability doesnt mean u cant feel pain does it? Thats something ive always wondered, i suppose it would be a bit shit if u could feel pain and u were invulnerable.

invulnerability, then u can do anything u want, u won't need the strength really because your impervious to injury

invulnerability and juggernot does have the streanght of the hulk 🙂

Originally posted by Magee
Invulnerability doesnt mean u cant feel pain does it? Thats something ive always wondered, i suppose it would be a bit shit if u could feel pain and u were invulnerable.

well if you're invulnerable then nothing can pretty much get through your epidermis into your soft tissue, i guess this means that you won't feel pain. you only feel pain when part of your body is sustaining damage. i guess you could still feel things, but they'd only tickle.

i take invulnerability anyday. i am contented with my strength as it is, and i could still find ways to grow stronger. i don't think there's anything i could do to increase my invulnerability tho, thats why i choose invulnerability.

Gregory is quite right. If someone had super-strength, then their tissues would be denser. Otherwise they could very easily hurt themself. In fact just moving would tear them apart.

So superstrength = dense tissue.

If you had sufficent strength, you could squeeze your muscles and crack you bones.

invulnerability, because you could work out anytime you want and strength will eventually come

well if you're invulnerable then nothing can pretty much get through your epidermis into your soft tissue, i guess this means that you won't feel pain. you only feel pain when part of your body is sustaining damage. i guess you could still feel things, but they'd only tickle.
Ahhh i see. Thxs for that, it all makes sense now lol.

Originally posted by thundercracker
id say invulnerablenessisity.......

😱 say it again....

Originally posted by thundercracker
id say invulnerablenessisity.......ness cause no 1 cud kill u u cud just go buy sum guns and no1 cud kill u but with the strength of the hulk u can just get shot

😆 ohh what an ass...

I'd pick invulnerability. I'd pick a fight with anyone on the street, and they wouldn't be able to stop me! waaahahahaha

lol, that would be cool.

It'd suck if you needed surgery though, how would they cut you?

I'm weary about having only one of these without the other. If you have only strength, you bruise normally, but if you have only invulnerability, when you get yourself stuck in a certain place, such as being buried in a pile of rubble, you can't do anything but call for help (if possible).

And even if you are nearly invulnerable, there are still certain levels that you are vulnerable. I think it was illustrated that Hulk is capable of drowning (vs. Wolverine in Marvel Comics Presents).

but if youre invulnerable you could just work out for a really really long time, and you'll eventually have a great amount of strength