Strength vs Invulnerability

Originally posted by chilled monkey
Gregory is quite right. If someone had super-strength, then their tissues would be denser. Otherwise they could very easily hurt themself. In fact just moving would tear them apart.

So superstrength = dense tissue.

That's not necessarily true.

How often would invicibility put you in the line of fire? Or collapsing buildings?

If you have massive strength, you could probably wear really strong, heavy steel armour and be a "superhero".

if youre invulnerable you dont need armor, and you could just work out for extremely long periods of time....kinda like luke cage

invulnarable would be mad cool I tell people to shot me lol. strength would eb cool but invulnarablity is better

Originally posted by Krissy Von Doom
If you have massive strength, you could probably wear really strong, heavy steel armour and be a "superhero".

acme corperation man, THEY HAVE IT ALL!!!

i think invisibility would be cool, but of the 2 provided id take invulnerability 🙂

Originally posted by Ytaker
If you had sufficent strength, you could squeeze your muscles and crack you bones.

I saw a video once where this weight lifter tried to lift way too much and he... well they sort of all just came right out... His bowels that is.

With invulnerability, you can still be incarcerated.