Originally posted by Robtard
See, this is why you're a retard, I SAID IT WASN'T THE SAME IN WORDING. Durrr...You got the shit part right, and it's in your head... you've said in the past that your wife is extremely attractive, while you're under average looking; you said this to prove some point in a thread you made.
But now your wife is just "average" looking? You clown, keep your stories straight, otherwise you back yourself into a corner when you twist and bullshit in a stupid attempt to prove your silly biased point.
Go on, dance some more for me Chee Chee.
Oh wait, this is where you act the fool and say what your meaning of any certain word is in an idiotic attempt to save face.
So if reproduction isn't what is "quintessential" for humanity to go on, what is?
Ooooo. a bit angry, aren't we mr. pancakes?
I never said my wife was average looking...now did it? I never said she was extremely attractive, now did I? Where is this corner I am supposed to be in? Don't you realize that there is more to attraction than just physical attraction? Durrrrr...
And it isn't Chee Chee...it is Chi Chi...durrrrrrr......
And no...I do not have to define quintessential because you can look that shit up yourself...also, there was already an argument about essential versus quintessential...I will NOT go over again...you can look that shit up if you really need to.
Also, my point was not what humanity needs to "go on" my point was sexual reproduction is not quintessential to go on....durrrrrr. I am pretty sure you can name of a large list of essential items for humanity to "go on"....so be my guest...but that isn't my point and I will not make it my point either.
Also, you got a little pancake on your left butt cheek...what kind of syrup do you use? Butter Pecan? I bet it is boysenberry because you like it to blend in with your dingle berries....durrrrrrrr! 😆
Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Are you struggling with who I was talking to? If so, It was directed at you, obviously, as not only was it right under your post, but also because you're the one acting like a complete idiot.
HAHAHAHA!!! no...not at all...I just think you were being lazy again...is it really that hard to use the quote button?
Originally posted by Violent2DopeIt's weird. He was spot on.
Lol, a sock imitating me? Wtf?
Originally posted by dadudemon
Are you being an idiot on purpose? I have already clarified my use of the word "retarded". I would say that it is okay since you first language is German*...but my use is obvious without me having to define its use...I defined it anyway...how about a nice warm cup of "omg, uv bin pwn3d, son!1"*shit fetishes
Ok, then I will take the cup now and........wait a minute, you didn't pwn me, you didn't address either point. You defined your personal usage of the word, which I said might fit on homosexuality, but that was a) not King's point (the point you were trying to defend) and b) not my reply to him.
I will give you an analogy of what happened so you understand
Random idiot: Bee's live on the north pole
Me: Bee's don't live on the north pole
You: You are wrong Bardock, I define bees as polar bears, now bees do live on the north pole.
Me: Aha
Originally posted by PiruBloodThat's a different issue.
ask yourselves this if homosexuality is both or just one then what would you label as child molestation? does a person chose to be a pedophile or are they geneticaly born like that?
But think about this, if you argue that homosexuals choose their sexuality, do you realize that you say you chose to be attracted to the opposite sex? Make an easy experiment to see if your argument is true. Just for a day, choose to be attracted to the same sex, if it is really chosen that should a) be no problem and b) be easily reversible. Try it.
Originally posted by PiruBloodThat person chooses to act on their feelings.
ask yourselves this if homosexuality is both or just one then what would you label as child molestation? does a person chose to be a pedophile or are they geneticaly born like that?
You can't help what you like, but you can choose to think it's wrong and to not act on it and to try your best to stop thinking in that way.
Anata wa wakarimasu ka.....
Originally posted by Bardock42
Names.
It was in response to Piru's Michael Jackson comments, but it was intended mostly as a general statement.
If I'm talking about complex topics (religion, philosophy, genetics, etc.), it's easy to see who knows what they're talking about and who doesn't. And for the latter, in lieu of reasonable opinions, they normally form an opinion on their own which is so absurd as to be hilarious.
I try to stay away from things I can't talk eloquently about, to avoid a similar fate, since I can't claim comprehensive knowledge on moer than a few areas. But listening to, say, an apathetic agnostic talk about their views on religion is an eye-opening and usually amusing experience.
Originally posted by DigiMark007
It was in response to Piru's Michael Jackson comments, but it was intended mostly as a general statement.If I'm talking about complex topics (religion, philosophy, genetics, etc.), it's easy to see who knows what they're talking about and who doesn't. And for the latter, in lieu of reasonable opinions, they normally form an opinion on their own which is so absurd as to be hilarious.
I try to stay away from things I can't talk eloquently about, to avoid a similar fate, since I can't claim comprehensive knowledge on moer than a few areas. But listening to, say, an apathetic agnostic talk about their views on religion is an eye-opening and usually amusing experience.
Seeing apathetic anything talk about anything is usually a most interesting experience
Originally posted by InnerRise
That person chooses to act on their feelings.You can't help what you like, but you can choose to think it's wrong and to not act on it and to try your best to stop thinking in that way.
Anata wa wakarimasu ka.....
i dont believe thatr. if you look at prisoners in jail and they got a wife and kids what makes you think it aint lack of sex? think about it if every prisoner in jail gets slammed in the butt would they turn homosexual? to me hell no. like i stated my older brother is gay i asked him this specific question and he told me specificly that he just knew at a young age.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Ooooo. a bit angry, aren't we mr. pancakes?I never said my wife was average looking...now did it? I never said she was extremely attractive, now did I? Where is this corner I am supposed to be in? Don't you realize that there is more to attraction than just physical attraction? Durrrrr...
And it isn't Chee Chee...it is Chi Chi...durrrrrrr......
And no...I do not have to define quintessential because you can look that shit up yourself...also, there was already an argument about essential versus quintessential...I will NOT go over again...you can look that shit up if you really need to.
Also, my point was not what humanity needs to "go on" my point was sexual reproduction is not quintessential to go on....durrrrrr. I am pretty sure you can name of a large list of essential items for humanity to "go on"....so be my guest...but that isn't my point and I will not make it my point either.
Also, you got a little pancake on your left butt cheek...what kind of syrup do you use? Butter Pecan? I bet it is boysenberry because you like it to blend in with your dingle berries....durrrrrrrr! 😆
That tactic is pathetic, "you're angry", "you're upset" blah blah blah. Poor form.
I have no desire to find that thread of yours concerning your wife, so, it's yours.
You baboon.... initial attraction/un-attraction to a person is physical. That attraction isn't a conscious choice, as previously stated; it is a fact of life.
And I ask you again, how is reproduction not "quintessential"? Are there other sound ways for humans to multiple?
Dude, your jokes are sophomoric at best... "pancakes, butt cheek, syrup." Please improve them.