Originally posted by queeq
Well, I refuted your ridiculous list of your so-called 'mainstream' biblical scholars.
The only thing that your attempted refutation proves is that you are a tremendous liar.
Originally posted by queeq
I'm sure I could refute anything you say that doesn't make sense here.
Then why do you continue to not address it?
All you can do is insult to support your claims. Besides I posted that reply liong before you posted yours. You just like to have a reason to insult people. Obviously you don't like to normally discuss it, at least not without constant insults, so on that premise I don't see the need to continue addressing it.
You wanna be right? Be right.
Originally posted by Schecter
sure. amuse the sock.(i just use 'whirly' as a synonym for sock these days. as for the actual individual i could care less, but the overall theme of epic fail applies universally.)
Why does everyone think I'm a sock? I'm not a sock! You can even PM my good friend pepsa about it. He can give evidence I'm not a sock. (And BTW yes I know what a "sock" is. It's an account started by a banned person to get back onto the forums. Sock would be short for sock puppet. Sorry to state the obvious, but I'm just stating I know what it is.)
Originally posted by queeq
In that case you'll have to do Schecter as well. Bonus for the insane.
I'll fight back. I'm not going to fellate anyone.
What caedus is a sock? Oh no!!!
Well at least we can all think on the bright side, we can wear him on our feet. ^__^
I call wearing him first!!
-__- No he's not a sock he's a person with sock-like qualities. He just can't help it. Doesn't he sound pompous sometimes? We forgive you!
-----
Oh and I think that you should just as a gay person weather they think it is a genetic thing or a chosen one. I'm sure a gay person would know if they chose something or they naturally feel it.
Originally posted by queeq
All you can do is insult to support your claims. Besides I posted that reply liong before you posted yours. You just like to have a reason to insult people. Obviously you don't like to normally discuss it, at least not without constant insults, so on that premise I don't see the need to continue addressing it.You wanna be right? Be right.
Chronology is rarely a substitute for correctness.
Originally posted by pepsa
What caedus is a sock? Oh no!!!Well at least we can all think on the bright side, we can wear him on our feet. ^__^
I call wearing him first!!
-__- No he's not a sock he's a person with sock-like qualities. He just can't help it. Doesn't he sound pompous sometimes? We forgive you!
-----
Oh and I think that you should just as a gay person weather they think it is a genetic thing or a chosen one. I'm sure a gay person would know if they chose something or they naturally feel it.
Thanks pepsa, but what do you mean sock-like qualities? 🤨 Although I will admit that I talk in a pompous sort of way. I just like using big words.
Originally posted by caedusrulesall
You know, this is probably the first time the word grandiloquent has ever been used on KMC.
Nope
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-446080-thors-new-look.html
Originally posted by Bardock42
Nopehttp://www.killermovies.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-446080-thors-new-look.html
Okay, second instance.
I can't believe I defeated the point of my own talking pompously by editing grandiloquent to "big words".
Originally posted by queeq
All you can do is insult to support your claims.
The link in my previous post proves otherwise.
Originally posted by queeq
Besides I posted that reply liong before you posted yours.
How am I to reply to a post that you had not yet posted?
Originally posted by queeq
You just like to have a reason to insult people.
As opposed to you, who insults others without provocation:
Originally posted by queeq
Oh, you came up with an intelligent question this time?
Originally posted by queeq
Obviously you don't like to normally discuss it, at least not without constant insults, so on that premise I don't see the need to continue addressing it.
I do not want to discuss it civilly, that is why I asked you no less than three times to address the comment in question without insult.
Indeed, I did not even address you as a liar until your misrepresented marginal archaeologists, Christian Broadcasting Network affiliates, and those whose mission is to otherwise pigeonhole archealogical evidence to support The Bible as mainstream archaeologists in an attempt to refute my argument.
Prior to this however, you addressed me as dismissable, nonsensical, ridiculous, and unintelligent.
How does it feel to be both a liar and a hypocrite? Can we expect you to be evasive and feign persecution now?
Originally posted by queeq
You wanna be right? Be right.
I do not need your concession that I am correct in order to be correct.
Originally posted by queeq
What comment exactly then? There are so many...
Originally posted by Adam_PoE[QUOTE=10236395]Originally posted by queeq
Would you call a five year old virgin homesexual or heterosexual?
I identified as homosexual when I was five years old. There goes your argument. [/QUOTE]