I would support this 'war'!

It seems to me that many leaders are overly confident about having a war.

They are very egar to bomb the country, to kill civilians even though they claim they ''didnt target them'', bring thousands of troops, (most of who are only children) into a country and let them die for something they dont believe in, but shitty reason they made up to cover up the real deal.

George Bush in particular is so certain there should be a war, and that this is a just war. Well if he wants a war so badly, I think he should have one. 👆

And this is my suggestion -

~ George Bush and Saddam Hussein in a large field. Id gve them both a sword, a mace and a shield, and a spear if they want one, and they could settle this themselves, the old fashion way.

~ They could have a war, like the true leaders would have!
And the war isnt over until they are missing a leg or an arm or are unable to have sex ever again, or are ideally dead.

And whalah, war over in 4 hours. Bam! no bombing no civilian kiling, just two blood thirsty dictators having a war! Just like they wanted!

And on a even bigger plus side, they wouldnt need to use propaganda to convince people that George Bush ''going into war'' is a right thing, I think everyone would support it anyway!

If theres such a thing as a 'fair war' this would, most certainly be it.

So, Mr. Bush if you are willing to have a war, as described above, just you and saddam, then by all means, Mr. Bush, you have my full support 👆

😂

Originally posted by lil bitchiness
and a spear if they want one,

For some reason this optional spear is the thing that caught my attention.

Originally posted by Mr Zero
For some reason this optional spear is the thing that caught my attention.

Yeah, I thought, having a mace, shield AND a sword and plus having a spear would be a little too much, therefore it should be optional.

He already has Saddam captured, why would he fight him now? He'll just throw him in prison and he'll get sodomized to death.

One thing in particular struck me as peculiar....."into a country and let them die for something they dont believe in"

I don't know if this statement is aimed at the current war in Iraq (probably is), but everyone who is currently fighting said war is there because they believe in the cause and want to be there. There is no draft, so therefore, no one is forced to die for anything, again, they're their because they do believe in the cause and want to fight for that cause.

Everything else I agree with. It would be neat to see GWB take on Saddam one on one. They could show it as a Pay per view on TV, and make some money off of it. They could also have dancing scantally clad women all around them while they fight.

Originally posted by lil bitchiness
Yeah, I thought, having a mace, shield AND a sword and plus having a spear would be a little too much, therefore it should be optional.

As I suspected - you enjoyed thinking about this a little too much.

haha

i say give them a sniper rifle, 3 bullets, serrated knives and bow and 5 arrows and let them loose in thick vegetation... again, spear optional...

No no no no, I ment in ideal world, imagening Saddam isnt captured.

And people who are in the army, even if they dont believe that the war should be fought, they cannot quit, or turn back, because they will be shot.

Originally posted by mc pee pants
i say give them a sniper rifle, 3 bullets, serrated knives and bow and 5 arrows and let them loose in thick vegetation... again, spear optional...

I like that idea better actually. And if anyone tries to cheat or run away - instant death.

oic. good idea. i'm all for it 👆

Originally posted by BackFire
He'll just throw him in prison and he'll get sodomized to death.

everyone who is currently fighting said war is there because they believe in the cause and want to be there.

one - could you clear up who it is that gets sodomised to death? SH or GWB?

two - your second point is just not true. Most people who join the army see it as a means to an end, not because they hope to go to war.

lil: True, but they aren't forced into signing up in the first place. I mean, people should know what they're getting into before they sign up for military service, especially if theirs a war going on.

It would be impossible to allow troops to just leave whenever they wanted. No one would stay there, they'd leave the immediately after they see their first dead body or lethal injury. It would be a mad house if people could just come and go as they pleased.

Originally posted by BackFire
He already has Saddam captured, why would he fight him now?

Haven't you seen gladiator?

Originally posted by Mr Zero
Haven't you [B]seen gladiator? [/B]

Unfortunately.

can't. keep. up. typing. too. slow.

Originally posted by Mr Zero
one - could you clear up who it is that gets sodomised to death? SH or GWB?

two - your second point is just not true. Most people who join the army see it as a means to an end, not because they hope to go to war.

1. Can't it be both?

2. How can you sign up for the military when their's a war going on and NOT want to go to war? That's just stupidity. If you sign up for military service you have to be prepared to fight in a war if one should break out.

Originally posted by BackFire
lil: True, but they aren't forced into signing up in the first place. I mean, people should know what they're getting into before they sign up for military service, especially if theirs a war going on.

Indeed, but i dont think they hope to see a war. As Zero alreay said, many people join the army because they have no alternative.

There is always an alternative.

Originally posted by BackFire
1. Can't it be both?

2. How can you sign up for the military when their's a war going on and NOT want to go to war? That's just stupidity. If you sign up for military service you have to be prepared to fight in a war if one should break out.

1. Idealy - HELL YEAH!

2. "That's just stupidity" HELL YEAH!