Originally posted by validus666]
first of all if someone is acting like a troll here is you... you are name calling, cursing, flaming, and posting false thing which is the clear definition of trolling the difference between you and me is the fact i get banned because i stood to badabing and called him a b!tch which he really is for not banning people that deserve it like youwith all that being said how is anything of this change the fact i just owned you and proved you are wrong
you didnt present any strength feat of sabretooth all you did was posting a statement of wolverine saying sabretooth became stronger than before dumbass but you didnt put any strength feat to suggest he is any near close the 10 ton you are trying to put him in, facts are that over the last 20 yearts sabretooth had only 1 strength feat and its that jeep which he couldnt move you fail idiot
no you dident. All you did was ignore everything you don't like. Thats not owning that you being ignorant putz
first off all I posted sabre-tooth ripping superhumanly durable individual head off, then I posted sabre-tooth wielding a generator as a weapon as well, but no you simply ignore this and keep repeating one low end showing in which you dont even get the object right, it was military hummer which weight way more then a jeep and only worked becuase wolverien had broken sabre-tooth neck and back. Sabre-tooth still go out of it. Honestly your simply talking out your ass.
Originally posted by Kinasin
W/E my feats are way better and show blade has the edge you lose. Also calling people dip **** isn't very nice and will be reported to the moderator.
every single strenght feat I posted was much more impressive.
durbaility feat I posted is more impressive.
I match every one of your speed feats with individual who proven to be inferior physically to sabre-tooth. Then provided evidence for why it relevent with having the narrative, sabre-tooth both stating the superiority and then I shown it on pannel being proven, but of course that goes against your views on what sabre-tooth is capable of so you ignored it.
You litterraly have shown nothing except repeatedly talking about how your feats are more impressive, with out actaully stating which one is more impressive and why.
whats worse is you actually thought that guy backing you ment something, guess what he got banned becuase he a sockign troll/ good job champ you got played by a troll.
Originally posted by Starscream M
sabretooth is def in the 10 ton class...he is prob just a little below spider-man in strength
In there fights it always seems like sabre-tooth is superior in strength to me at least
1. you can't use wolverine to prove sabretooth is faster, that's abc logic, you have to use sabretooths own speedfeats. Thats like me showing blade keeping up with dracula then using draculas speedfeats.
2. spitfire was going just as hard as blade was in the fight, or didn't you notice that Blade stopped the fight before spitfire did.
Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
Actaully it means a great deal when it stated by both charactr, the narrative and shown on pannel.so you got nothing. How did you have way betetr feats? Ever single strength feat I showed was more impressive. The feat against kill power is again far more impressive then taking on deacon frost. Do you know who killpower is?
and I easily match all your speed feats abd by a character that stated and shown to be inferior in speed to sabre-tooth.
ive proven every point I needed to.
if that's the case, then your statement that the spitfire scan means nothing is null and void seeing as Spitfire has stated that Blade can beat her in a fight.
Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
Becuase that what member of the forum gave when posting the feat and I yet to find any contradictory evidence.wtf makes you think that vampire god wieghts more then a generator?
I showed equal feats to both with invidividual with inferior speed to himself. yet you keep on ignoring this.
You think that he blade could easily cut of sabre-tooth head? are you ****ign retard? If wolverine can't do that, what makes you think inferior blade could? Honestly now your just being **** tard to be one.
Dracula should ****ing destroy blade. In forum battle blade would get ass raped. Dracula is completely dumb down when he fights Blade. If dracula fought sabre-tooth the way he fights balde he gett raped.
Hey since you got such a chip on your shoulder and we all know your never gunna get thoese scans for raph debate, how about Wolverine vs Blade battlezone, me vs you. Becuase I love to put you in your place. If you can't even prove blade superiorty to wolverine, sabre-tooth shouldent event be debated. I not sure how your so ignorant on the matter, but sabre-tooth is pysically superior to wolverine in ever single senses.
also false, blade is able to beat dracula due to a number of immunities to vampires powers, dracula has beaten his most powerful opponents by drinking their blood and increasing his power, this can't happen with blade. He has also used combinations of hypnosis and mist and such, hypnosis doesn't work on Blade and Blade can sense when vampires are in mist form. Most other character don't have these advantages and thus get owned by Dracula.
also, wolverine did cut of Sabretooths head.
Originally posted by Trackz
1. you can't use wolverine to prove sabretooth is faster, that's abc logic, you have to use sabretooths own speedfeats. Thats like me showing blade keeping up with dracula then using draculas speedfeats.2. spitfire was going just as hard as blade was in the fight, or didn't you notice that Blade stopped the fight before spitfire did.
Sabre-tooth has stated on pannel several times he physically superior, wolverine has admitted it several times and narrative has stated it several times. It has also been proven numerous times right after such statements were made. That massively different then Blade fighting dracula then using dracula speed feats. Only way that be comparable is if Blade was state and shown on numerous sources that he superior to dracula physically.
Your trying to argue an orange is an piece of bread. while I am argueing a orange is an orange.
No she wasent. Blade got disarmed completely, he really had no chioce in the matter. He was trying to kill her when she was not trying to kill him, infact she was trying to prove she could control her blood lust.
Originally posted by Trackz
also false, blade is able to beat dracula due to a number of immunities to vampires powers, dracula has beaten his most powerful opponents by drinking their blood and increasing his power, this can't happen with blade. He has also used combinations of hypnosis and mist and such, hypnosis doesn't work on Blade and Blade can sense when vampires are in mist form. Most other character don't have these advantages and thus get owned by Dracula.also, wolverine did cut of Sabretooths head.
how does being able to senses mist form matter? wolverien can senses kitty phasing doesent help him at all, when he tries to hit her.
trying to uses blade beating dracula = him beating sabr-tooth is very delusional logic.
after sabre-tooth let him, how is that relevent to this thread?
Originally posted by Starscream M
those scans don't really show either are being strongeragain I think creed is very close to spiderman...but if spiderman's pissed, than he will be def stronger than creed
Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
yes I can. There a huge differences between blade keeping up with a jobbing dracula and my arguement.Sabre-tooth has stated on pannel several times he physically superior, wolverine has admitted it several times and narrative has stated it several times. It has also been proven numerous times right after such statements were made. That massively different then Blade fighting dracula then using dracula speed feats. Only way that be comparable is if Blade was state and shown on numerous sources that he superior to dracula physically.
Your trying to argue an orange is an piece of bread. while I am argueing a orange is an orange.
No she wasent. Blade got disarmed completely, he really had no chioce in the matter.
Dracula doesn't job to blade, see in my next post. Also, no there isn't.
If we're using statements then Blade can take on Ghost Rider and has just as good a healing factor.
Blade beat Dracula in his first fight with him written as a half-vampire, dracula fled in the second, third time (MI:13) it was shown that Dracula is now obsessed with fighting Blade. ALl of these add up to Blade being able to hang equally with Dracula. However, that doesn't mean I can suddenly use Draculas feats of strength and speed for Blade. It's abc logic and is inadmissible.
who got the last hit in? who grabbed her and stopped the fight? also we have spitfire's statements that Blade can beat her in a fight.
Originally posted by Trackz
if that's the case, then your statement that the spitfire scan means nothing is null and void seeing as Spitfire has stated that Blade can beat her in a fight.
hoever sabre-tooth example isent once, it numerous times being stated by sabre-tooth, wolverine and the narrative. It also was shown numerous times.
Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
He fought silver surfer and apoc prior to drinking either blood. He jobbs like crazy to blade and never utilizies his numerous abilities when he fights blade.how does being able to senses mist form matter? wolverien can senses kitty phasing doesent help him at all, when he tries to hit her.
trying to uses blade beating dracula = him beating sabr-tooth is very delusional logic.
after sabre-tooth let him, how is that relevent to this thread?
He fought apoc by biting him then forcing him into submission, he used both hypnotism and his strength to subdue a mentally distraught silver surfer.
Being able to sense where an opponent is better than being completely blind to where they are going to attack
I never even made an assumption about who would win the fight, I'm only attacking your poor arguments.
Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
not really that could be chalked up to hyperbole.hoever sabre-tooth example isent once, it numerous times being stated by sabre-tooth, wolverine and the narrative. It also was shown numerous times.
Sabretooths statements could be chalked up to hyperbole
Dum anyway you look at you lost just admit defeat. You've had 3 or more people tell you that you can't use wolverine's feats for sabretooth yet somehow you fail to grasp this concept. My feats have mashed yours with ease, precision, grace, and brutality. End game checkmate you lose end of story good night sweet dreams happy thoughts.
Originally posted by Trackz
Dracula doesn't job to blade, see in my next post. Also, no there isn't.If we're using statements then Blade can take on Ghost Rider and has just as good a healing factor.
Blade beat Dracula in his first fight with him written as a half-vampire, dracula fled in the second, third time (MI:13) it was shown that Dracula is now obsessed with fighting Blade. ALl of these add up to Blade being able to hang equally with Dracula. However, that doesn't mean I can suddenly use Draculas feats of strength and speed for Blade. It's abc logic and is inadmissible.
who got the last hit in? who grabbed her and stopped the fight? also we have spitfire's statements that Blade can beat her in a fight.
again your using hyperbole statement. I not using one time examples. I using facts. These have been facts since day one. They been stated numerous times by both characters and the narrative. These arnt bold claims being made, these are hard cold facts, that anyone who read wolverine would know. I can post numerous examples and have already posted 4 in this very thread.
again dracula jobs to him. Clearly not the same level dracula that fought surfer. No it doesent, dracula isent billed as blade inferior physically nor has numerous statements of the same effect being stated. Nor can he even uses haft the abilities dracula can. Your using completely different examples as arguements.
Originally posted by TrackzI actually believe he could take her down in a comic, but I also believe capt could amoung others. Forum match however, doubtful. Actually depends how fast she really is, I never seen it been stated how fast she moves nor her reflex speed. I Always wonder with certain speedstir if there relfexes are on par with speed.
hyperbole? you mean telling another character that if I ever turn evil I trust you to take me down is hyperbole? Blade beat spitfire in their first confrontation, and stalemated her in the second.Sabretooths statements could be chalked up to hyperbole
No it can't. It been like that since day one, state by sabre-tooth numerous times, stated by wolverine numerous times, stated by impartial narratives. It also been shown right after such statements which I posted already. Your trying to argue an apple as an orange. My arguement is very different from yours. I not taking random statements, I taking repeatedly used facts. It a fact Sabre-tooth is wolverine superior physically this has always been the cases. I alreayd provided evidence.
