Sabertooth Vs. Blade

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
naw blade can just hang with silver sufer and apoc now right 🙄

again your using hyperbole statement. I not using one time examples. I using facts. These have been facts since day one. They been stated numerous times by both characters and the narrative. These arnt bold claims being made, these are hard cold facts, that anyone who read wolverine would know. I can post numerous examples and have already posted 4 in this very thread.

again dracula jobs to him. Clearly not the same level dracula that fought surfer. No it doesent, dracula isent billed as blade inferior physically nor has numerous statements of the same effect being stated. Nor can he even uses haft the abilities dracula can. Your using completely different examples as arguements.

i fail to see what you're not grasping, Dracula beat those people using a combination of powers that don't work on Blade.

What is hyperbole about it, heck when Blade turned into switchblade and had the powers of a vampire he beat Ghost Rider senseless, I'm using the same type of nonsensical arguments you are, ABC logic isn't admissible, you can't use wolverine's speed feats in a thread about sabretooth, if you want we can bring a mod in and have them tell you the same thing I'm guessing.

skimming other peoples arguments and reposting your own doesn't make you correct. Reread what has been posted. Also just for the future it's spelled 'half'.

Originally posted by Kinasin
Dum anyway you look at you lost just admit defeat. You've had 3 or more people tell you that you can't use wolverine's feats for sabretooth yet somehow you fail to grasp this concept. My feats have mashed yours with ease, precision, grace, and brutality. End game checkmate you lose end of story good night sweet dreams happy thoughts.

again which feats, you keep cherping that there better, but every time I asked which ones you fail to answer the guestion.

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
I actually believe he could take her down in a comic, but I also believe capt could amoung others. Forum match however, doubtful. Actually depends how fast she really is, I never seen it been stated how fast she moves nor her reflex speed. I Always wonder with certain speedstir if there relfexes are on par with speed.

No it can't. It been like that since day one, state by sabre-tooth numerous times, stated by wolverine numerous times, stated by impartial narratives. It also been shown right after such statements which I posted already. Your trying to argue an apple as an orange. My arguement is very different from yours. I not taking random statements, I taking repeatedly used facts. It a fact Sabre-tooth is wolverine superior physically this has always been the cases. I alreayd provided evidence.

Make captain america vs. spitfire, he'll probably lose. She has super strength, durability enough to fall from space and crash land and heal in several seconds, and extreme super speed.

Blade statements have been backed up as well, he has all of a vampires strengths, none of their weaknesses. Stated and restated, so I'll go ahead and start using Hannibal King, Deacon Frosts, and others feats for Blade.

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
I had you, a troll, and blade fanboy? I also had two people back me up, so it 3 to 3 except one of my guess isent a known trolling sock lol.

again which feats, you keep cherping that there better, but every time I asked which ones you fail to answer the guestion.

*Hearsay is hearsay don't you understand??? I also could call PIS, but why bother when I can call hearsay instead. Also wolverine is just saying he is better than what he was and not saying he is better than himself. The first scan is just some dumb narration that is meaningless lol. It's all PIS and hearsay sweety.*

Originally posted by Trackz
i fail to see what you're not grasping, Dracula beat those people using a combination of powers that don't work on Blade.

What is hyperbole about it, heck when Blade turned into switchblade and had the powers of a vampire he beat Ghost Rider senseless, I'm using the same type of nonsensical arguments you are, ABC logic isn't admissible, you can't use wolverine's speed feats in a thread about sabretooth, if you want we can bring a mod in and have them tell you the same thing I'm guessing.

skimming other peoples arguments and reposting your own doesn't make you correct. Reread what has been posted. Also just for the future it's spelled 'half'.

no your not. There not the same. I not using random people. Like wolverine beat hercules so thats means sabre-tooth will ect. I talking purely physical stats. Sabre-tooth is physically superior to him. This has been stated numerous times and I already provided evidences for it. It does not mean sabre-tooth beats everyone that wolverine does. However it does mean that phsycially sabre-tooth is faster and stronger then wolverine. He has the speed capable of dodging anything wolverine does. He can easily lift anything wolverien can, however that does not mean he will do it.

We know sabre-tooth is faster then wolverine.

becuase blade has superior dodging feat (becuase sabre-tooth doesent dodge missle weapons becuase frankly he neevr needed to) does not make him faster then sabre-tooth, because we known sabre-tooth is faster then wolverine who can and has match every single one of blades dodging feats. Blade isent going to speed blizt sabre-tooth and we know this becuase he easily match and been shown superior in dirrect comparisions with people who have feats equal to blades own.

Originally posted by Kinasin
everytime you ask which ones are you ****** serious. People can scroll through this thread and see I have answered all of your charges. I'm not gonna repeat myself because you feel the need to troll. Your elitist attitude won't allow you to admit fail. As far as the scans you showed where sabretooth narration stated he was better and showing wolverine saying he was better than he was not better than himself her was my answer which you didn't even reply to.

Hearsay is hearsay don't you understand??? I also could call PIS, but why bother when I can call hearsay instead. Also wolverine is just saying he is better than what he was and not saying he is better than himself. The first scan is just some dumb narration that is meaningless lol. It's all PIS and hearsay sweety.

No you can't. Because there proven facts. You saying thee pis, doesent make them pis, jsut make you an idiot. He said this and then showed it......how is the hersay? Now the narrative doesent matter? really? last time I checked narrative mean more then any person words in comics.

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
moving at light speed, having 100 ton strength ect. now does not work on blade? or how about turn completely immune to physical attacks? or claling upon lightning? whats blade now immune ti lightning also? Dracula physically should rape blade. anyone who can match silver surfer physcially in a stalemate and apoc would destroy blade.

no your not. There not the same. I not using random people. Like wolverine beat hercules so thats means sabre-tooth will ect. I talking purely physical stats. Sabre-tooth is physically superior to him. This has been stated numerous times and I already provided evidences for it. It does not mean sabre-tooth beats everyone that wolverine does. However it does mean that phsycially sabre-tooth is faster and stronger then wolverine. He has the speed capable of dodging anything wolverine does. He can easily lift anything wolverien can, however that does not mean he will do it.

We know sabre-tooth is faster then wolverine.

becuase blade has superior dodging feat (becuase sabre-tooth doesent dodge missle weapons becuase frankly he neevr needed to) does not make him faster then sabre-tooth, because we known sabre-tooth is faster then wolverine who can and has match every single one of blades dodging feats. Blade isent going to speed blizt sabre-tooth and we know this becuase he easily match and been shown superior in dirrect comparisions with people who have feats equal to blades own.

Originally posted by Trackz
Make captain america vs. spitfire, he'll probably lose. She has super strength, durability enough to fall from space and crash land and heal in several seconds, and extreme super speed.

Blade statements have been backed up as well, he has all of a vampires strengths, none of their weaknesses. Stated and restated, so I'll go ahead and start using Hannibal King, Deacon Frosts, and others feats for Blade.

except we know vampires have different levels. Your again argueing apples are oranges. I argueing sabre-tooth is superior becuase he stated it, wolverine stated it, the narrative has stated it, weapon x has stated it and it been shown right after being stated numerous times.

Your arguement would work if I was saying every single feat wolverine does, any lupin could do. Becuase that generalizing an entire race. I not doing that because different individual are naturall better then others in every race.

honestly your arguement is not the same.

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
again which examples? you keep dodging it. which feats were more impressive then the ones I posted? why can't you answer a simply question? are you really that scared?

No you can't. Because there proven facts. You saying thee pis, doesent make them pis, jsut make you an idiot. He said this and then showed it......how is the hersay? Now the narrative doesent matter? really? last time I checked narrative mean more then any person words in comics.

Blade.

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
moving at light speed, having 100 ton strength ect. now does not work on blade? or how about turn completely immune to physical attacks? or claling upon lightning? whats blade now immune ti lightning also? Dracula physically should rape blade. anyone who can match silver surfer physcially in a stalemate and apoc would destroy blade.

no your not. There not the same. I not using random people. Like wolverine beat hercules so thats means sabre-tooth will ect. I talking purely physical stats. Sabre-tooth is physically superior to him. This has been stated numerous times and I already provided evidences for it. It does not mean sabre-tooth beats everyone that wolverine does. However it does mean that phsycially sabre-tooth is faster and stronger then wolverine. He has the speed capable of dodging anything wolverine does. He can easily lift anything wolverien can, however that does not mean he will do it.

We know sabre-tooth is faster then wolverine.

becuase blade has superior dodging feat (becuase sabre-tooth doesent dodge missle weapons becuase frankly he neevr needed to) does not make him faster then sabre-tooth, because we known sabre-tooth is faster then wolverine who can and has match every single one of blades dodging feats. Blade isent going to speed blizt sabre-tooth and we know this becuase he easily match and been shown superior in dirrect comparisions with people who have feats equal to blades own.

...I swear.

ok Dracula can't move at light speed. Doesn't have 100 ton strength. Being physically immune to attacks does little seeing as he can't attack while in mist form. Most vampires use this more just to travel or toy with opponents. Blade however can sense where he is in mist form thus eliminating and surprise advantage dracula would gain by it. Dracula rarely ever calls upon lightning, and only used it against Thor because he was amped. Dracula was amped against Apocalypse too. Dracula hypnotized and weakened Surfer, something which wouldn't work on Blade. Have you read any of these fights yourself?

I am doign the same thing, I'm using statements and on-panel proof as evidence that Blade can beat spitfire, I'm using statements and on-panal proof that Blade can take on Dracula physically, I'm using numerous statements that Blade has all the strengths of vampires and none of their weaknesses. So according to your logic I can now use feats from hannibal king and deacon frost since it has been stated that Blade has all of their strengths and one of their weaknesses.

I never argued who is faster either. But using wolverine to try and prove someone is faster is illogical and not only that you're holding a double standard. It's ok for you to bring in wolverine fights, but not ok for me to bring in other vampires threads that Blade has been stated on-panel to have their strengths.

Originally posted by Kinasin
yet you can't pull the scans out of your *** to prove sabretooth is faster and more agile. Prove it by showing the feats and not just talking ****.

whats your arguement? That sabre-tooth is faster then Wolverine, but slower then Blade who wolverien can match every feat of?

do you even see your logic? How can he possibly be faster then character who on par with blade (if not superior) but is someone slower then blade, espeically by extend your trying to pretend.

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
yea and if you make one for blade he loses to. blade holds not advantages over capt.

except we know vampires have different levels. Your again argueing apples are oranges. I argueing sabre-tooth is superior becuase he stated it, wolverine stated it, the narrative has stated it, weapon x has stated it and it been shown right after being stated numerous times.

Your arguement would work if I was saying every single feat wolverine does, any lupin could do. Becuase that generalizing an entire race. I not doing that because different individual are naturall better then others in every race.

honestly your arguement is not the same.

never argued that, stop changing subjects.

no, we know vampires have different species, and Blade has been said to have all of their strengths again and none of their weaknesses. All the strengths and weaknesses that vampires share blade has, stated on panel. Therefore going by your logic I should be able to use their feats. Now, because you see how ridiculous that would be, you're arguing against it when in fact you're trying to do the exact same thing by using wolverine's feats. double standards.

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
already did. I show scan of sabre-tooth being stated as faster, showing he faster then wolverine. Then showing wolverine doing the same feat. Thats all the prove I need.

whats your arguement? That sabre-tooth is faster then Wolverine, but slower then Blade who wolverien can match every feat of?

do you even see your logic? How can he possibly be faster then character who on par with blade (if not superior) but is someone slower then blade, espeically by extend your trying to pretend.

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
already did. I show scan of sabre-tooth being stated as faster, showing he faster then wolverine. Then showing wolverine doing the same feat. Thats all the prove I need.

whats your arguement? That sabre-tooth is faster then Wolverine, but slower then Blade who wolverien can match every feat of?

do you even see your logic? How can he possibly be faster then character who on par with blade (if not superior) but is someone slower then blade, espeically by extend your trying to pretend.

I done, you guys believe the garbage you want. I not wasting my time with this anymore. I don't like sabre-tooth at all and dont' have the patients to debate with either of you too, it like slamming my head into adamatium wall.

Even if I proved beyond a doubt that sabre-tooth is physically superior to wolverine (which he is, and I still can't believe my scans were it been stated and shown isent enough) you both still argue.

have a nice day with your delusions.

kinsan still waiting for you to prove your whole turtle bullshit. I waiting for the battlezone. hopefully I not waiting for nothing because frankly I don't like you and I can't wait for us to go one on one, because I think your going to be in for a shock.

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
I done, you guys believe the garbage you want. I not wasting my time with this anymore. I don't like sabre-tooth at all and dont' have the patients to debate with either of you too, it like slamming my head into adamatium wall.

Even if I proved beyond a doubt that sabre-tooth is physically superior to wolverine (which he is, and I still can't believe my scans were it been stated and shown isent enough) you both still argue.

have a nice day with your delusions.

kinsan still waiting for you to prove your whole turtle bullshit. I waiting for the battlezone. hopefully I not waiting for nothing because frankly I don't like you and I can't wait for us to go one on one, because I think your going to be in for a shock.

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
I done, you guys believe the garbage you want. I not wasting my time with this anymore. I don't like sabre-tooth at all and dont' have the patients to debate with either of you too, it like slamming my head into adamatium wall.

Even if I proved beyond a doubt that sabre-tooth is physically superior to wolverine (which he is, and I still can't believe my scans were it been stated and shown isent enough) you both still argue.

have a nice day with your delusions.

kinsan still waiting for you to prove your whole turtle bullshit. I waiting for the battlezone. hopefully I not waiting for nothing because frankly I don't like you and I can't wait for us to go one on one, because I think your going to be in for a shock.

Originally posted by Kinasin
lol finally admit defeat eh. Cause me and you both know your not gonna get a scan of sabre dodging a spitfire speed blitz.

still waiting for the battlezone. You need to be put in place and I am the man to do it.

I rather do wolverine vs turtles, but I think your spineless and you will never get it done, so I even do Sabre-tooth vs Blade against you. I hate sabre-tooth, thats how confident I am in your lack of knolwedge and debating prowesses. So when you get the balls and man up PM me.

We did sabretooth vs blade right here dip**** and here's blade moving so fast he leaves an after image of his body.