Spiderman vs. Captain America/Daredevil/Wolverine

Started by jinzin244 pages

the question was if I had ever seen spiderman fight without morals but retain his emotional cool.....the answer: yes...I have...but based on his showings as such...he's not impressive in the least.

he usually lasts much much longer against hulk when he has his morals...

i think this has something to do with the timidity of his character since he is such a defensive fighter (more reactive, than active if you can follow me).

in any case..those two examples were not even the blood lusting one's I was thinking of....

Originally posted by jinzin
ridiculous...you can't just let the namor thing go can you? wolvie stalemated him and made a fool out of him, get over it...

Um, you already said the stupid namor fight was ridiculous, but then used odin as an example, Draco saw this as well, I brought that up for your little "environment" babble.

Namor wins because most of the earth is 3/4 water correct?

Originally posted by jinzin
I never said wolverine was going to win in water against him..that's simply absurd..the basis for my arguement there was they fight out of water as that's the only way he'll win...

No your argument, is this environmental advantage, but is it safe to assume that namor would win, since the earth is mostly water?

Originally posted by jinzin
so they're fighting in an arena and there's plenty of cars around?

I said, an option, I never brought up the cars, get over it.
Something you and cresh seem to be bitter over, you want to overlook facts, and dismiss common sense.

Originally posted by jinzin
Obviously 🙄

This here proves you have little else to offer.

Originally posted by jinzin
quite frankly, I've shot down the car argument using several theories..you simply can't admit when your wrong..the fact that you're putting owned after your own post to support yourself is hilarious though 😂

How have you shot it down, you brought it up, you SHOT DOWN, your own arguments.

To add to that, you can't use logic, and you are still bitter anyway.

I've shot down your "theories", that are ridiculous and use little fact.

"Wolverine destroys buildings in a swiped."

See that, you continue to fail and use logic.

Originally posted by jinzin
the question was if I had ever seen spiderman fight without morals but retain his emotional cool.....the answer: yes...I have...but based on his showings as such...he's not impressive in the least.

he usually lasts much much longer against hulk when he has his morals...

i think this has something to do with the timidity of his character since he is such a defensive fighter (more reactive, than active if you can follow me).

in any case..those two examples were not even the blood lusting one's I was thinking of....

Where has he done this, not against the hulk?

Common sense dictates that he can destroy these guys quite easily by doing other things.

Destroying property to reach his goal, killing, using weapons, etc. Is what I mean.

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
Where has he done this, not against the hulk?

Common sense dictates that he can destroy these guys quite easily by doing other things.

Destroying property to reach his goal, killing, using weapons, etc. Is what I mean.

dude weapons? you're grasping...

and yeah it was against hulk i gave you the issue title a few posts ago...

Originally posted by jinzin
.
That's pretty badass. . . bludgeoning a guy with Spiderman . . .

Originally posted by jinzin
dude weapons? you're grasping...

You aren't listening at all to what i'm saying.

Spiderman doesn't fight like this, its against his character.

i'm saying imagine him using weapons destroying property, etc.

Originally posted by Creshosk
That's pretty badass. . . bludgeoning a guy with Spiderman . . .

😂

no doubt man...

Originally posted by jinzin
😂

no doubt man...

Here I agree with you...

Spiderman is nice and flexible, should give a nice "WHACK!!"

He's got some snap to him, like a whip.

Originally posted by Wanderer259
He's got some snap to him, like a whip.

Would that be bludgeoning or flailing then?

I'd say flailing...

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
OWNED!!!

I think Mitch just "swung" off himself here.

Originally posted by MERCILOUS
I think Mitch just "swung" off himself here.
You are dumb and ugly.

This teaches you guys to strap up before sex.

Why do you revive threads, and contribute jack shit, only swing off of jinzin and cresh's balls, its all you've done on the various threads, pathetic.

I've only read over the last 10 pages of this thread, but at any rate I thought that this was useful info. TOHOTMU states: "Spider-man also has severe inhabitions about using his strength against an opponent without superhuman powers for fear of killing him or her."

The thread specified that this wasn't the case, so that isn't a factor...

The only way Spiderman would use his full might on these guys is if hes angry. Therefore if he is angry and using his full might, he still loses, due to the fact that he wouldnt be focused and the rage takes over his precision. A angry Spiderman is a sloppy one.

Even if not using his full strength, he can still put enough power in his punches to knock out either of his opponents. Question is does he land the hits? Daredevil(doubt it) Cap(doubt it).

Originally posted by jrodslam
The only way Spiderman would use his full might on these guys is if hes angry. Therefore if he is angry and using his full might, he still loses, due to the fact that he wouldnt be focused and the rage takes over his precision. A angry Spiderman is a sloppy one.

Even if not using his full strength, he can still put enough power in his punches to knock out either of his opponents. Question is does he land the hits? Daredevil(doubt it) Cap(doubt it).

Not necessarily angry, but out of character, is just doing what it takes to win, using an item, smothering etc.

to all those non believers who are fixated on the human vs. superhuman arguments.......

hmmmmmmmmmmmmm,

.

..this one kind of just....DEFINES cap in my opinion...