If you seriously believe that, then you have been fooled by the media. If you believe that eigther one of the candidates are going to do anything positive for this country, then you have been fooled by their bullshitting abilities. I just believe that Kerry would make the country worse off. The only way that you will get the truth from kerry or bush, is if they unzipped their pants zipper and spoke from their crouch. I vote for Bush because Kerry is a narc, contradicts himself, his wife is totally disrespectfull to American people, and his running mate is an ambulance chaser. These are the reasons that swayed me. LOL who gives a shit. This country isnt going to get any better, no matter who gets in. The only thing is if a democrate gets in, there wont be a republican in office again for a long time, and the next president will probably be clintons wife, if kerry gets in.
By the way, dont beleive what the news tells you about who is ahead. Look we wont know who the next president is untill about Easter. Earliest would be late January.
Originally posted by shellie
we're f*cked with either one sweetie but i guess Kerry is the lesser of 2 evils 😬
Yeah, that's the main key right there, but I look at it this way, if Bush were to give arabs/all of them jobs who live HERE, I wouldn't mind, but giving those jobs overseas is useless. Kerry atleast wants to keep the jobs here. Also if Bush wins, what if in his new rain of terror he starts to close abortion clincs, what are raped girls, and the such suppost to do?
Originally posted by finti
worse off? what do you mean, Bush politics on war against terrorism have made both US and Europe an unsafer place to live
You cant say that. War was going to be taken the doorstep of terrorism regaurdless of who the American president was. these people dont understand and dont want to work things out civilized. Al-Queda would have been taken on eigther way, whether it was further down the road or to fast to soon. When it comes to terrorism, no one is safe. The only way to combat it, is with countries uniting against it. This is exactly what Bush is accomplishing. Bush wants to keep open party talks with countries who are not yet involved, and Kerry wants to do bi-lateral talks with those countries. eigther way, no matter who is President or who was president. Terrorism, was and will be an ever widening threat on the entire world for a long time to come
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
The fact that the country I live in has been made a target as a result of George Bush is enough reason to not like him.-AC
this country has been a target before Bush's actions. NO matter who would have been president, Al-queada would have been specifically targeted, inspiring a more severe outlash on America, and participating countries. Also, no matter which country in the Middle East that America would have targeted, Iraq would have always been a looming threat and problem because of sadaam. I do believe the way we went about taking him out of power was extreme and rash, but he would ahve made things harder . This target you say that is on america, was always there and would have grown in hatred no matter what choices were amde. Remember they attacked us.
You cant say that. War was going to be taken the doorstep of terrorism regaurdless of who the American president was.Norway was never in the danger zone before GWB wanted to finish the job his dad didnt manage. I am a soldier in my native countrys military force and I gladly defend Norway if Norway is attacked. I aint gonna raise a gun abroad though cause some piss ass foreign leader thinks we ought to becasue we have responsibilities as an ally.
but if your countries leaders agreed, that wouldnt be the decesion of a piss ass foriegner, that would be your countries choice.it is the piss ass foreign leader that request our presence by puting political pressure on our leaders. Norway has agreed to supply medical equipment and personell to Iraq, and we have sent the special forces to Afganhistan since the Norwegian specila forces is specialized in mountain warfare. The opposition in parliament would never agree to send military personel to Iraq since the opposition have a majority togehter with the anti war people in government.