Posted by PVS
kingkoot, you openly admit to willfully ignoring
news so long as it is negative about bush? are
you serious? if you dont read that article, then
i have ZERO respect for you.
Well, negative ads for Kerry aren't all true, and you believe nothing the ads say about Kerry, so should I respect you? Yes I respect you anyways. Thanks for not respecting me for admitting I'm ignorant which is more than you can say for some people you might respect.
Should I make you listen to Rush Limbaugh?? That wouldn't even get considered.
fine, its clear to me now that bush supporters really dont
give a shit. its not about whats best for the country, its not
about keeping troops safe, and it is certainly not about being
informed with ALL news, good and bad. i didnt realise till now,
after seeing news of suck importance be completely ignored by
100%, thats right 100% of bush supporters.
why ignore it? it works against you in this little pointless debate?
after weeks of you right wing freaks browbeating everyone about
"dishonoring our troops" and "not being for america" and "you are
ignorant of the issues" you DARE to ignore?
SHEEP
Originally posted by kingcoot
Posted by PVSWell, negative ads for Kerry aren't all true, and you believe nothing the ads say about Kerry, so should I respect you? Yes I respect you anyways. Thanks for not respecting me for admiting I'm ignorant which is more than you can say for some people you might respect.
its an AP article and its the TRUTH.
its not campaign mudslinging, its a TRUTH which has been held
back and covered up by the pentagon for the sake of getting bush
reelected. and you will not even read it?
if that is the case, and i hope its not, then SHAME ON YOU.
and if that is the case, then dont bother having respect for me, because i have no respect for you.
Well, the democrats lost all the republicans on this election. That is true. How did Kerry lose to an idiot? You should reason that we didn't get all our information from thin air. I'd pay more attention to what is really happening than some news articles. News media is there to sell an image of the truth, but not the clear image. So we are left to wait and see really what plays out in 4 years. Then vote Hilary if Bush really makes a mistake.
Kharmadog, If they did do such a thing, why would they keep acting like they had something to hide. That is what really is the question. It isn't over, so let us watch this thing unfold. Most wars take 4 years, Iraq was over in months. Now the terrorists seek power in the void, and we do have the obligation to protect Iraq. I'd give support to the President if you'd give your support to the troops. I just don't understand how people just write Bush off because they think he is an idiot. Prove he is an idiot without stating anything from a biased media source. I can't prove anything either way so leave it at that. I didn't say his poop smells like a beautiful flower garden.
If someone is Religious like Bush are we supposed to write him off as a stereotypical wacko that will take power to the ends of the earth to stop some guy from killing Americans. Actually, even if Bush is a wacko, Osama hit us first with our own faults which were not changed previously by any president, so to blame the current president is convenient.
fine, i will bring the article to you
highlites:
"Explosives were looted from the Al-Qaqaa ammunitions site in Iraq while outnumbered U.S. soldiers assigned to guard the materials watched helplessly, soldiers told the Los Angeles Times."
"U.S. Army reservists and National Guardsmen witnessed the looting and some soldiers sent messages to commanders in Baghdad requesting help, but received no reply, they said"
"The soldiers who spoke to the Times asked to remain unidentified, saying they feared retaliation from the Pentagon."
"The Pentagon has offered accounts that suggest the explosives were removed before the U.S.-led invasion to oust Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein and not during the chaos following the fall of Baghdad."
They kept "acting like that" because they were a dog backed into a corner. Once again understanding middle-east ideas of pride and politics would have helped Bush out tremendously. It was also the feeling of being insulted and embarassed, they were kicking a dog when he was down. They knew that he had nothing and they still wanted to come in, that angered Sadam and he reacted how they thought he would.
The Cia had also put observers in with UN inspectors and that was found out (by both sides). I wouldn't have let them in either if I thought the CIA might be with them.
Originally posted by kingcoot
I still have yet to see any democrats support Bush in his 2nd term. Thanks for the support guys. And Bush is responsible for every technical error in communications over Iraq desert.
like i said, selective ignorance
THEY WERE OUTNUMBERED
THEY RECIEVED NO HELP
IT WAS COVERED UP
We have to pay attention what has happened so far, that is the only thing we have to go by.
He went looking for wmd's, didn't find them.
He went looking for a terrorist link, didn't find one.
He went to liberate the Iraqi people, and he's still there, so they ain't quite liberated.
Results so far, people coming in from other countries to fight, more terrosim than ever before, an INCREASED risk of terror against the united states, and unprecedented global disapproval of United states and her foreign policies.
How is this going to get better?