Originally posted by ragesRemorse
Dude, no it wasnt. Everyone knows the Oreo company had the hit put on on JFK. Ol jack found out that the oreo company was putting LSD crystals in the creamy white icing, he had big plans to expose them. Damn man, i thought everyone knew that.
😂 I have to spread that rumor around.
Hey folks, back after a great weekend so now I am compelled to respond to what I've missed out on the last couple of days.
"Bush is an economist. What ever makes success in business is valid in how people act. Myself and Bush are more Darwinist than Kerry, and so I say, that is why I vote Bush. "
-Bush knows nothing about business, he failed at just about eevry business venture he started. Bush is also not a Darwinist but a Creationist.
" There is something he sees in the terrorists no one understands. They really do not want to believe they are being controlled, but they want to believe the US and free countries are causing their position. "
-I think the problem is not that he understands the terrorists, the problem is his lack of understanding. The could care less about america's freedom. They are protesting america's foreign policies over the last 30 years.
"Osama using fear and Bush and Kerry using fear are different. "
- No it is not.
"B]This is the truth from what I see. Bush does not want power.[/B]"
-This quote is so laughable that I noted on it, but will not comment on it.
"I think everyone that voted for Bush understands the 2nd amendment. Right to bare arms. "
- the right to bare arms was written at a time that a young country was fighting for it's freedom and was also intended give the power to the people to rise up against an unjust government, times have changed and this is one of the most perverted sections of the US constitution
"In the end, force does change a person's actions if words don't work. Words weren't working. Why else did the UN need 16 resolutions in 10 years?"
-Hitler and Stalin would agree with you, Martin Luther King and Ghandi might not. Also the UN resolutions were working. The country was buckling. No doubt it would have taken longer. But less americans and Iraqi's would have died.
Even if you believe if there are weapons or not, Saddam did have them and he wasn't complying under the rules of the UN, so there may be motive and a reason for it. Too bad Saddam thought he probably had weapons when his people may have lied to him. I wouldn't blame Bush for Iraqi officer lies to Saddam.
-Hitler and Stalin would agree with you, Martin Luther King and Ghandi might not. Also the UN resolutions were working. The country was buckling. No doubt it would have taken longer. But less americans and Iraqi's would have died.
Maybe more American Civilians would be hit over here instead of US soldiers over there. Welcome to reality. People aren't all good. That goes for Saddam and Osama if you are to include Bush.
why dont you bush lovers quit ignoring this thread?
This is the truth from what I see. Bush does not want power."
-This quote is so laughable that I noted on it, but will not comment on it.
It is laughable, but what if he really doesn't want power. He took office after Clinton, Hello... lied under oath to a grand jury... The presidency isn't where you go to have a good time. Think about it, and you wouldn't be laughing. Bush is in to set something right. Laughable... whatever. Think what you think, it just doesn't make it true. Same for me, but I can be right at the same time. Laugh it up when you do see what does happen.
As far as the 2nd amendment... good luck changing it. You will have 30 states ready to keep it the way it is. Guns have a purpose, they are protection for families and you can't take that right away. You want farmers to just sit there without the right to hunt or shoot clay pigeons.. that is really good to piss off people with guns. It almost makes sense.
I mean, it doesn't make me feel safe to let the police have guns with no guns for the rest of us. That allows police to run us like an animal farm.
This isn't Canada or Minnesota, it is the US.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/11/04/iraq.weapons.ap/index.html
CLICK THE DAMN LINK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Been there PVS, even posted, I agree with ya.
I've said it before and I'll say it again. Clinton lied about bangin' a plump chick. Bush lied about reasons to go to war. I don't think you can compare the two.
As for the second amendmant, it will never change, I just think it's funny that it is used to defend the right to bare automatic weapons, and the thought of joe suburbia defending his house from terrorists as he stands on his porch with an M-16 is just stupid.
Bush didn't lie about reasons to go to war. Saddam wasn't complying. If you want to change the history books, go ahead and twist it up.
Bush didn't go to war on Saddam planning on taking him alive... how did that happen? Saddam really wanted to save his own skin.
If Canada, and Europe, and France wants to put Bush in the same category as Hitler and Stalin, I'll put Canada in the same catagory as Hollywood.