'Sith Eyes'- Discussion

Originally posted by J-Unit
then why hasn't dooku yellow eyes because hes not so full of hatred as anakin will be

Does anyone else find it irritating reading reply's from those who make a point of utilizing horrible grammar?

To your point: Possession of yellow eyes does not automatically make one a Sith.

Q: What does make you a Sith?

A: Being either a master or apprentice in a Sith succession. Besides the Sith have been able to keep their presence hidden for nearly 1000 years probably by refraining from advertising who they are in not so subtle ways like.....having blazing yellow eyes! And by using the force to distort their appearance (Palpatine).

What if the scene we saw is part of a vision(I know people dont like Dream so ill use Vision). Not anakins vision but A vision Obi-Wan has, or mabey Padme. Honestly I dont think it will happen in the movie unless someone sees it as a warning of things to come.

Well, I guess now we know that Anakin's sith eyes were not just for the trailer...Boy was I wrong.....oops!

And now itas been released that they arent part of a dream or vision...hmmmmmm

So is Vader going to have yellow eyes in the next version of ROTJ then?

unlikely-:i think that the reason that anakin has yellow eyes is cuz hes 100% darkside and by the time of ROTJ hes like 40%darkside!!!this is all in my opinion

Originally posted by Morridini
So is Vader going to have yellow eyes in the next version of ROTJ then?

Oh Lord, lets hope not....

NO MORE CHANGES!!!

OK so now what? We've got 4 known Sith (Sidious, Dooku, Maul & Anakin) and only 3 of which are shown withthe sith eyes......
Dooku is the odd man out. If JP & co are right & it is related to a surge in emotion:
1) why does Dooku never have sith eyes? He was pretty worked up in his duels with Ani/Obi/Yoda
2) Why do Maul's eyes NEVER change? Not even Ted Bundy was THAT mad ALL the time....
Bet anything this question does NOT get resolved in ROTS....

Im with you I dont see a resolution either 🙁

but wouldnt it be waaaaay cool if Padme gets to see them eyes first?

That would be...chilling

Not wanting to sound picky, bilbo, but those are the same questions I asked in the first damn post! 'Why never on Dooku but always on Maul," I asked, if it was emotion. So as I say, that theory still does not run for me.

Have we seriously only managed to come full circle so far? That's poor.

Why, oh WHY, did Anakin have to have those silly "sith eyes"! Lucas just couldn't leave well enough alone, could he?

This will go down, in my book at least, as one of the silliest additions to the films.

Oh, the agony!

corn

a resposta está lá fora

Gee... what an odd thing to get worked up about! It's quite a cool addition really.

So far, only two theories have been presented which are plausible and fit the facts:

1. Sith can do it at will. So Maul chooses to always, and Dooku chooses to never.

2. All Sith have the eyes, but can use the Force to mask their appearance. Palpatine and Dooku keep a low profile; Maul never bothered or was no good at it.

Or maybe it's another one of those things that Lucas is making up as he goes, with no rhyme or reason, leaving plot holes big enough for a Bantha to fall into.

That's why I'm worked up.

cornponious

Of course, maybe it's not Sith eyes at all, maybe it's just red-eye.

Gotta get red-eye reduction on the imperial cameras.

corn

Originally posted by cornponious
Or maybe it's another one of those things that Lucas is making up as he goes, with no rhyme or reason, leaving plot holes big enough for a Bantha to fall into.

That's why I'm worked up.

cornponious

Hardly a plot hole!

And again, it has been mentioned several times that there is neither proof of a logical explanation or need FOR one- in the films, style counts for more.

But I just wanted us fans to create one anyway. If the film has one itself as well... so be it.