I get most of my information like you guys from tv newspaper sites my dad.
I search out info, I don't have it fed to me. I do not recieve info from your father or mine even. I get info from "international" papers and sites. I also read opposing parties' viewpoints and check the facts to see who is most likely telling the truth.
That to me is being mortal. Just wondering but what do you think being mortal is?JM
Morals - Of or concerned with the judgment of the goodness or badness of human action and character
Mortal - #1 Liable or subject to death.
#2 Of or relating to humankind; human:
he is againt abortion and is not allowing the same sex marriage thing to be allowed. And he has only one wife. Unlike kerry who has two wifes.
Kerry does not have two wives, he is divorced with one wife. Also you described a set of morals. Everyone has a set of morals, but peoples morals can be different. You just happen to agree with Bush's.
That is why I question your judgement at such a young age. You have believed what you have read and been told as opposed to seeking it out for yourself. You also have a limited knowledge of the world around you and how to express it. That all comes with age and maturity (for most of us at least).
why does believing in God make you moral?
You can have morals without believing in God. Actually, i feel you can have better morals if you don't believe in God, because you make your morals for yourself, instead of following some pre-determined way to live your life.
God and State are seperate...him believing in God proves nothing. Nor does John Kerry having a 2nd wife.
OMG! he made a bad choice picking his first wife....clearly that makes him immoral.
like lying to an entire nation about WMD isn't an immoral act?
yes, god told him.
god also told him that over 100,000 (so far) innocent
iraqis need to die, because god hates brown people
...god told him to ignore global warming and forsake
fuel alternatives to oil...because god hates the environment...
and god told bush to rig the election...because god hates the left.
Originally posted by Linkalicious
lemme guess.....God told him to lie to his people?
I was being sarcastic with my comment. The sad thing about most people (atheists and believers alike) is that they feel that God is responsible for everything.
When something goes right... most times people are too busy to thank God. When something bad happens, God is responsible.
God does not interfere with free-will. God does not make exceptions for believers or good people. Life is life... make what you want of it. The worst thing is that most believers carry out stupid, senseless, and needless acts in the name of their God.
🙄
Sorry, wrong place, wrong time.
Originally posted by Linkalicious
lemme guess.....God told him to lie to his people?
Just thought i would say that Bush diddnt lie about WMD, he actually believed they were there. As did Kerry. Bush is still a pussy for not taking the blame though. He is still putting the blame on intelligence, and even brought Kerry into it, by continuously saying how Kerry was for the actions in Iraq due to the intelligence that we had.
That's where I disagree rages. I don't think Bush believed that there were any WMD's there. For years they had credible sources say that Sadam had dismantled his chemical/biological weapons and his nuclear program. He had very restricted airspace, and not enough money and resources to re-establish a very effective conventional force.
I've have brought it up before, but Colin Powell said it (feb 24, 2001) and Rice backed him up (July 2001) that all intelligence reports show that Sadam Hussien poses absolutely no threat to the United states or even to the stability of the region.
Then all of a sudden (conveniently after 911) all these reports about Iraq's weapons programs surface. Not one report came from a credible source, and not one report has yet proven true. The excuse that we had to go in because Sadam would not let in UN inspectors is a crock o' shit. The american government knew that Sadam wouldn't let in UN inspectors because Sadam had found out that the US had previously sent in CIA agents with other inspection teams. It was for that reason and personal pride (to save face and look strong for his subjects) that Sadam refused the inspections. It was a game that both sides had been playing, and Bush upped the anti pretty damn quick.
Bush had plenty of intelligence and proof that Sadam was no threat, and he knew that there was no terrorist link. That is why many of the world's nations and people (and from what I see many american citizens) are angry.
frome MoveOn.org:
"A compiled petition with your individual comment will be presented to your Senators and your Representative in Congress."
hey, a recount is probably not gonna happen, but it wouldnt hurt to sign it.
please click the link and make your voice heard.
RR> “if you believe that article, you should not be allowed to vote, or associate with the public.”
So anyone who believes weird stuff be allowed to vote? Wouldn’t that exclude the entire Bible-belt?
You REAAALLLY believe that Bush thought there we WMD in Iraq? With the biggest, meanest intelligence-agency in the world…??? Naahhhh…
All> Well, if Bush and co, stole the election again, what’s new from 2000?
I think more than 80 % of us Europeans WERE hoping for Kerry, including me (well, anyone BUT Bush).
Bush and morals?? Didn’t he run off from service? Didn’t he drink himself half to death? Believing in God doesn’t equal morals. Need I say, hmm, Catholic priests and young choir-boys just as ONE example?
Yep, ”mortals” indeed 😄