John Connor - General Discussion

I have seen them but never actually read one. Are they worth looking in to?

Originally posted by ignosis
kyle is a pseudo name

kyle is john connor its a evidence
he goes in 1984 to create himself

Could you please present the evidence?

Yeah I have seen them at Barnes And Noble several times before.

Originally posted by alic88
^ and baseless

I agree

Originally posted by Konjammenson
Could you please present the evidence?

Yeah we are waiting........

Originally posted by CoCooN
Would you go watching Terminator if Arnie would not act in it?

Hell no! (unless its the war of the machines)

and it is gonna b the war of the machines... well it better be

I hope so

Back to topic for a sec..

I thought Stahl was a bit of a miscast from the John Conner in T2. This guy looks shrimpy, meek and somewhat stupid, I really hope there is an improvement in the next one.

Originally posted by vvvrulz
Back to topic for a sec..

I thought Stahl was a bit of a miscast from the John Conner in T2. This guy looks shrimpy, meek and somewhat stupid, I really hope there is an improvement in the next one.

1. Nobody even watches these forums anymore anyways. 😛

2. I completely agree with you.

well judging by what nick stahl was given.. he did a good job.. i haf seen his other roles he is very talented.. but not nearly as good an actor 2play john connor...eddie was alwayz da man.. he ruined it himself and he knows it.... who do u think cud haf been john connor

it's nothing against nick as an actor or his performance in the film. its just how he looks. not sure who would have done better. i would have prefferred some no-name actor who looks more the part. of course, a no-name actor would have destroyed the hollywood glitter this movie shines so proudly.

I think the script is what truly ruined John's character and way more than Nick could have.

ya i mean when u look at nick's past roles none of them were action roles or even close2it.. its kind of a pity.... mostow said in an interview: I ALWAYS WANTED NICK TO PLAY THE ROLE, HE IS THE PERFECT MAN.. ya right thts coz u cudnt get eddie furlong2play.. and cudnt think of n e 1 good

Furlong is a mess now and him playing John now would be alot worse than Nick playing him. Like you guys said before an unknown would have been best for the role but only if there were a good script as well.

His script was not nearly as bad as Kate Brewsters.... UGH...

Originally posted by vvvrulz
His script was not nearly as bad as Kate Brewsters.... UGH...

True that one was just horrible. 😘

ya kate brewster is down-right awful... i dont even know where2start from

Me either she was just that terrible, everything from the script, actress, and all the way to the character was bad.

She needn't even be in the movie.

I agree