who created god

Started by TacDavey51 pages
Originally posted by Quark_666
You're right, it's not vague. It just kinda knock's out theistic assertions that something (ie. everything) can't have always existed and therefore needs a creator.

There is no theistic assertion that nothing can be eternal. Not one I know of at least.

Originally posted by TacDavey
There is no theistic assertion that nothing can be eternal. Not one I know of at least.
The universe without God?

Originally posted by Quark_666
You're right, it's not vague. It just kinda knock's out theistic assertions that something (ie. everything) can't have always existed and therefore needs a creator.
How does it knock out that assertion?

God is supposed to be unique in the universe.

it is the infinite regress thing where we keep going back in a giant circle.

If God is real you would have to ask what was before him before he became the Great I Am.

Originally posted by Mindset
How does it knock out that assertion?

God is supposed to be unique in the universe.

You’re asking, how does an existence without intelligent design knock out the assertion that intelligent design is the only explanation for anything. Is this a game?

Originally posted by Quark_666
The universe without God?

What? Theists don't say the universe can't be eternal because nothing can be eternal. They say the universe isn't eternal because modern cosmology says the universe isn't eternal.

Originally posted by King Castle
it is the infinite regress thing where we keep going back in a giant circle.

If God is real you would have to ask what was before him before he became the Great I Am.

Not quite. You would only have to ask what was before Him if He had a beginning. God did not begin to exist, and thus there was nothing before Him since He has always existed.

Originally posted by Quark_666
You’re asking, how does an existence without intelligent design knock out the assertion that intelligent design is the only explanation for anything. Is this a game?
Try reading the second part of my post.

Originally posted by Mindset
Try reading the second part of my post.
Uniqueness is fantastic, but it doesn't explain what makes God more eternal than the universe.

Originally posted by TacDavey
What? Theists don't say the universe can't be eternal because nothing can be eternal. They say the universe isn't eternal because modern cosmology says the universe isn't eternal.
Modern cosmology says matter didn't come in neat little atomic packages and it wasn't extended into the storm of galaxies that it is today. The universe has always existed, and theists didn't ask cosmology before they became theists.

EDIT: before they said the universe must have been created by intelligent design.

Originally posted by Quark_666
Uniqueness is fantastic, but it doesn't explain what makes God more eternal than the universe.
His uniqueness in the universe is that he is omnipotent.

That all the explanation you will get, and in this case, all you will need. That is how it can be said that God doesn't need a creator, but the universe does. The affirmation of the first statement does not disallow the other.

Funny. That sounds an awful lot like the reason the universe doesn’t need a creator, too. And you’re right, the affirmation of the first statement does not disallow the other, but it certainly stops the other from demonstrating the need for a God. Which was my point.

Originally posted by Quark_666
Funny. That sounds an awful lot like the reason the universe doesn’t need a creator, too.
How?

Originally posted by Mindset
How?
Well because obviously unlimited power has the power to spontaneously exist, so as long as we're deciding on who's omnipotent, we might as well say the universe is omnipotent too.

The universe isn't sentient.

Originally posted by Mindset
The universe isn't sentient.
Neither is God, but I fear we are both saying things we don't know for sure.

This thread is working under the presumption that God exists.

This thread is working under the assumption that God was created. The question, "who created the Tooth Fairy" doesn't assume the tooth fairy exists.

Originally posted by Quark_666
This thread is working under the assumption that God was created. The question, "who created the Tooth Fairy" doesn't assume the tooth fairy exists.
You're leaving out part of the post.

If it were, "Who created the Tooth Fairy if the Tooth Fairy created us", it presumes that the Tooth Fairy exists since we obviously exist.

I actually interpreted that as rhetorical, but I'm happy to pretend God exists for one thread!

OK.