I'm afraid that history will be far kinder to GWB than we would hope. Conservative media praises him as the second coming of Christ, while liberal media is so afraid of being called liberal media that it won't paint the president appropriately. The historians who speak against him will be labeled "hacks, who don't see complexities," and it will be fashionable to approve of the Bush presidency in about 20 years.
Sad.
Actually it was the south that did vote for bush.I think mainly because there is alot of christens there.JM GO SOUTH!
.......I hate you now.......Before I just didnt like you, but now, Ohhohoho.....Do you relize that Puritans, one of the most severe branches of the church, landed in Massachusetts, if you didn't relize, not Louisiana....
Originally posted by FeceMan
Yep, I'm a dumbass.
He sees the light!!! -Does the Miracle dude thing-
Originally posted by Darth Surgent
I'm afraid that history will be far kinder to GWB than we would hope. Conservative media praises him as the second coming of Christ, while liberal media is so afraid of being called [b]liberal media that it won't paint the president appropriately. The historians who speak against him will be labeled "hacks, who don't see complexities," and it will be fashionable to approve of the Bush presidency in about 20 years.Sad. [/B]
Very well said.
I'm afraid that history will be far kinder to GWB than we would hope. Conservative media praises him as the second coming of Christ, while liberal media is so afraid of being called liberal media that it won't paint the president appropriately.
you know why Liberal media is so afraid to be called liberal??? because their Liberal and never do #$%^!!!!
and he is not the second coming of christ but he is the best leader this country has had in a long time, and Thank the Lord he is in for 4 more years!!
Originally posted by Darth Surgent
I'm afraid that history will be far kinder to GWB than we would hope. Conservative media praises him as the second coming of Christ, while liberal media is so afraid of being called [b]liberal media that it won't paint the president appropriately. The historians who speak against him will be labeled "hacks, who don't see complexities," and it will be fashionable to approve of the Bush presidency in about 20 years.Sad. [/B]
Im gonna disagree with you DS.
History will not be kind to George Bush, because history is not only written in America, and since George Bush has affected so many countries in so many ways, all those will write history.
Just because he has so much power does not mean he will be praised - Hitler had massive amounts of power as did Stalin as did Mussolini - history is not as kind to them.