Peter Jackson is only good because he did a film about one of the most classic books ever written. And besides have you seen the stuff he did before he did LOTR, although it was really funny it was crap. LOTR would have been just as good had any directer had the right funding. (Except Quentin Tarintino coz he just screws up every movie).
KONG SEQUELS CONFIRMED!
OMG!!! SON OF KONG!!! This is gonna rock sooo much!
http://img-nex.kongisking.net/kong/movies/day123-480x270-mpeg4.mov
Originally posted by Aku
Peter Jackson is only good because he did a film about one of the most classic books ever written. And besides have you seen the stuff he did before he did LOTR, although it was really funny it was crap. LOTR would have been just as good had any directer had the right funding. (Except Quentin Tarintino coz he just screws up every movie).
ummmm ????? Dead Alive ????? sorry but that movie is OUTSTANDING
Zilverze, I don't think that any director could have done the job that P.J did on Lotr for the single reason, they didn't have the vision of his and they didn't have the info e.g what New Zealand contains. There was no man better for the job, nor would the film have worked without Weta Workshops doing the CGI, they're the best IN THE WORLD!!!!!!!!
Originally posted by KillTheLight
..it looks really good..hope it's not a let down
Hope it's not a let down? This is Peter Jackson we are talking about here. saying "I hope it's not a let down" is like going to a bulls game and saying "I hope Michael Jordan slam dunks the ball". It's inevitable, Kong will be great.