Seems a little pixelated to me, people isn't exactly clear but it's clear enough to read I'll give you that, and your KMC name on the sleeve is good, the writing isn't exactly the best and I think I see rain but I'm not sure if it's on the whole sig or just on that guy...if it's on the whole sig then it's very hard to see with that background
I'm not trying to be spiteful I'm trying to be honest, I was gonna give you a 7 cuz I thought if I gave u the rating I did give you you'd think I was being spiteful
Originally posted by One Free Man
I find the lack of anti aliasing around the curves on the edges of your Sig disturbing. If you made it a little smaller and saved it as a png you would fix this.The center of your triptych is way to vague, you can't tell what it is and you can barely make out the outline of the guy so you can't tell where the gun on the bottom right corner is from. Also, you can see a lock of hair coming outside of the crosshair which would never happen in a gun scope. It has poor balance, and is a triptych, which is a rather amateur move, imo.
4/12harsh enough for you?
There's a difference between being harsh and being honest.
Oh BTW You need to have an actual educated opinon on what makes a good signature rather than spewing out "Harsh" dumbshit.
Just saying.
Originally posted by Vinny Valentineit was educated and accurate. you have horrible antialiased curves and poor balance and the scope crosshair thing, the lens glair doesn't start with the cross hairs but a bit within it, and the lock of hair does exceed the fov of the scope.
There's a difference between being harsh and being honest.Oh BTW You need to have an actual educated opinon on what makes a good signature rather than spewing out "Harsh" dumbshit.
Just saying.
the middle-right is very vague and hard to identify as anything in particular.
Originally posted by One Free Man
it was educated and accurate. you have horrible antialiased curves and poor balance and the scope crosshair thing, the lens glair doesn't start with the cross hairs but a bit within it, and the lock of hair does exceed the fov of the scope.the middle-right is very vague and hard to identify as anything in particular.
lol @ u.
Get a better computer screen.