Blade 3 Best Computer Graphics Ever

Started by rwoonacott2 pages

Blade 3 Best Computer Graphics Ever

I know that there has already been a discussion on this movie, however being a big fan of Blade movies it has been said that this up and coming feature is going to pack more action and more computer graphics then that last two movies.

The first movie was very good and had some outstanding computer generated graphics at that time. The story was well written and the action was tight.

When the second movie was release I really liked it, however there were a few areas in which I think they could have done better in computer graphics action simulations. I feel that when Blade first met the blood pack they could have done it a lot better then what they did. The sad part about this, is the fact that you cannot blame the Graphics departments, the studio needed this movie to be released on time, so most of the work was not completed.

Blade 3 is said to hold a lot more action and a lot more computer graphics action. Some people already feel that this movie is going to be a flop and not exceed the previous stories. I on the other hand feel that this movie is going to be the grandfather of all the Blade movies to date.

So if any of you have anything to add on this subject I really would like to hear from you. I know it is really hard to decide at this moment, but there are fans out there that are looking forward to this movie.

I hated the CGI effects in parts of the second one, looked awful. Blade 3 isn't getting good reviews.

Neither did the first 2, not that reviews mean anything to me.

isn't Blade 3 being promoted as the 'finale' to the trilogy any way?
like first he faced the vampires who made him, then he faced the enemies of his enemies, super vamps blood pack or whatever...

now he faces

Spoiler:
the first/last vampire, the grand daddy of all vampires,
etc etc... and
Spoiler:
with Whistler's daughter

or something like that...

not many more places for the story to go really, after that, without becoming redundant and repetitive retread, I would think.

not that that ever stops Hollyweird from churning out this crap!

CG Were Rushed

Originally posted by MildPossession
I hated the CGI effects in parts of the second one, looked awful. Blade 3 isn't getting good reviews.
I do have to agree with you on this one, the CG were totally rushed in that movie. As for reviews, can you point me in the direction where I can read those reviews? Because seeing the movie has not been released here in the states yet, I want to read where it has been released at.

I think you are right

Originally posted by SlickRick69
isn't Blade 3 being promoted as the 'finale' to the trilogy any way?
like first he faced the vampires who made him, then he faced the enemies of his enemies, super vamps blood pack or whatever...

now he faces

Spoiler:
the first/last vampire, the grand daddy of all vampires,
etc etc... and
Spoiler:
with Whistler's daughter

or something like that...

not many more places for the story to go really, after that, without becoming redundant and repetitive retread, I would think.

not that that ever stops Hollyweird from churning out this crap!

I really would hope that this would be the last movie, just like you said, there isn’t much more they can do with the story line, they have covered everything that needs to be covered.

I thought Whistler's family was dead 😕

^ they are supposed to be he says they were all killed by vamps in the first movie don't he?

the 2nd movie was really poor IMO the CG was terrible as said earlier and the story didn't interest me.

i hope they make the 3rd awesome cause i think it looks kinda alright from the trailers. i want less CG in films more actors actually acting.

They filmed three different endings for Blade 3, so it could be end of the franchise or a new beginning. We will find out when it hits theatres.

Anyway here some nice info if you want it, but it might ruin the film for some of you

Spoiler:
Whistler dies in the new film, he is killed by the police after they find where Blade's headquarter is. 2 One of the filmed endings include both Blade and Dracula killing eachother. I got this info from SSH a few months ago from someone who saw the film at a test screening, if you want I can give you the link too.

Anyway Blade II's quote "bad" CGI could have been because the budget was only abut 50 million dolllars.

Only mediocre CGI in "Blade 2" were the reapers, with the mandible jaws. You guys are panning for gold in a sewage drain. C'mon..

Originally posted by Cinemaddiction
Only mediocre CGI in "Blade 2" were the reapers, with the mandible jaws.

I agree

The first movie was let down at the end with that terrible scene at the end where the guy is split in two and the blood goes flying up.

It let down such an amazing movie.

But the rest of the movie was fantastic.

I haven't seen the second, but it sounds to me like it isn't as good as the first.

I really do think though that the 3rd is going to be FANTASTIC!

Originally posted by )-(&C]{£R
I really do think though that the 3rd is going to be FANTASTIC!

Me too! 😎

i don't think it's gonna have the best graphic... maybe in the franchise. the CG in blade 2 was more than adequate. he looked less cartoonish than in blade. the only thing with the blade 2 graphics was that the fight between neesa and blade, the CGI movements were to fine and fluid. if you compare them to the catual fighting movements of blade and neesa, they don't move as fluidly.

Well they have 11 million more dollars than Blade 2 for Blade:Trinity. I'm assuming the CGI will be better with the extra money.

The review was from people who have seen special screenings, like aint it cool news website etc.

Just look up reviews. I don't listen to reviews hardly, just mentioning it got some negative ones.

I really hope that this next movie will pull out all the stops and do well, I am really looking forward to seeing it this next weekend and it would be better to see it before drawing conclusions based on prior movies.

The money issue really isn’t that much of a set back on the picture its self, I would be fooled into thinking it might, however due to the changes in the economy things always cost more in the long run. Blade Part 2 was very well directed and the story was pretty much to the point, but lacked many elements.

As for the CG in Blade Part 2 they were a lot better then in Blade one but that is only because the computer technology is changing all of the time. That can be seen in Spiderman 2 there were a lot more CG in that picture because the development is becoming more precise.

Over all, I go along with all of you, and in the long run we are all going to have to see what new things are going to come from this next movie. Lets hope it does well.

Originally posted by MildPossession
The review was from people who have seen special screenings, like aint it cool news website etc.

Just look up reviews. I don't listen to reviews hardly, just mentioning it got some negative ones.

It also got ALOT of good ones. So saying it had negative ones doesn't even matter to tell you the truth.

Right we will just have to see this wed.

Originally posted by rwoonacott
Right we will just have to see this wed.

Yeah

I'm going to be the first in line. 😈 😮‍💨