Blade 3 Best Computer Graphics Ever

Started by ragesRemorse2 pages

I remember the CGI for the original blade being up to par. The effects in the sequal seemed a little to ambitious for the budget they had to work with though. I dont mind that i could tell that it was a computer animation everytime Blade leaped twenty feet in the air, or was fighting against more than two enemies, but i still noticed. I see many people are saying the effects in Blade 2 were bad, but they werent. The effects went hand and hand with the tone of the film. Now if you said that the story or execution was bad, than, i could agree with you, but the effects were noticable, but decent enough to get the point across without being raunchy.

As for Blade 3 having the best graphics, i highly doubt any movie will top the CGi use in the lord of the rings movies for a while.

Originally posted by ragesRemorse
As for Blade 3 having the best graphics, i highly doubt any movie will top the CGi use in the lord of the rings movies for a while.

Blade is a COMPLETELY different film from LOTR. Blade 3 is not suppose to have the best CGI "ever" because it does not need massive amounts of it like Spider-Man. (1 and 2) It only needs the CGI when the characters/actors have to do something that is not physically possible such as falling 50 feet and crashing into the ground.

Some people say that the SW prequels have poor special effects. Those people are also known as idiots.

Still, I can't see anyone making the argument that Blade 3 will have better CGI than SW Episode 3.

Originally posted by Darth Surgent
Still, I can't see anyone making the argument that Blade 3 will have better CGI than SW Episode 3.

Like I said before, Blade 3 doesn't have to have better CGI because its a completely different genre of film. Its not suppose to have that much CGI like SW does.

Originally posted by Darth Surgent
Some people say that the SW prequels have poor special effects. Those people are also known as idiots.

Still, I can't see anyone making the argument that Blade 3 will have better CGI than SW Episode 3.

The Star Wars prequels are nothing but special effects, which is sad. Must be a dull experience, acting out almost an entire movie infront of a green screen, that is when your character isn't CGI.

TFP is right, nobodies making that arguement anyway.

Now gull darn it, this is my fault and I should have explained myself a little better, when I said best CG ever, I totally meant only the Blade movies and nothing else. Jeepers, sorry about that.

Originally posted by Cinemaddiction
TFP is right

Thanks 😎

Don't worry. This film is going to be great.

And about Whistler's daughter. Her origins are explained in the movie.

seen the movie

it was not as good as the first two.

I mean its watchable but not has good 🙁

watchin blade trinity tonight, lets see how its gonna be then!

Originally posted by ash007

I mean its watchable..

Barely. That's being generous. You can see my review for more scathingly negative remarks.

Originally posted by Cinemaddiction
Neither did the first 2, not that reviews mean anything to me.

Man, you ARE reviews. 😮‍💨 Good ones too; I've never seen a review I didn't agree with.

I'm usually pretty fair with my reviews, but I honestly didn't see anything positive in this one, aside from

Spoiler:
the reaper dogs. The CGI was pretty well done, but only there.

It was Great!!! to me. 😮‍💨

So can someone give me a review seeing as I wasn't allowed into it because I'm not 15.