Originally posted by who?-kidAnd Spider-Man dodges with ease. He's famous for dodging. He has dodged - without breaking a sweat - multiple laser attacks, sometimes even with gunfire at the same time to make it more interesting.
Nope, he can't dodge forever. True. But he doesn't need to. It's not like Cyclops is going to play with Spider-Man, it's the other way around: while dodging, Spider-Man jumps to Cyclops and knocks him down. Or webs his eyes, which will confuse Cyclops only for a very short time, but that's more than enough for Spider-Man.
Well, you're right. But don't forget, Cyke is an extremely well trained hero. This whole time (actually, a while ago, I've stopped now) I've been saying that SM won't get at Cyke for a phys. attack. Oce he gets close, he gets beamed. SM would have to stay at bay. The closer he is, the harder it is to dodge. Web-eyes does nothing. Scott's blast would evaporate it before it could hit him at al, I just realised. I doubt if he would be confused at all. His training is too heavy to allow him to lose his head in battle.
Or he can use his web to throw Cyclops a few hundred yards away lol. He has lots of possibilities. Cyclops only has one: hit Spider-Man. And hitting Spider-Man is very tough to do.
Spidey only really has 2 possibilities. The ol' bonk 'im on the head trick. Won't work. Or the Swing him by his leg trick.
I don't think that that's a factor either. The web moves fast, I know, but I think the split second it takes to get from PP to his leg, and the split second it takes for PP to start pulling, Scott has blown up the webbing and is already attacking again.Spider-Man has been described as being "blurring fast when he wants to", that's just too fast for Cyclops.
And yes, Cyclops is cool and yes, he is way underrated, but Spider-Man is in another league. [/B]
I actually really dislike Scott. lol
ps. please don't stop arguing. The two other threads I'm in are being clogged up by morons with no arguements. just Thanos would win. Thanos would lose... So keep it up 😉 I think you're wrong, but you are bringing decent/good arguements to the table. THNX