Spiderman movies suck

that's not true ... Stan Lee doesnt have an opinion when it comes to the spider-man movies or any other marvel movies , all the rights belongs to marvel and sony so he wouldnt stopped it from being released

he could have kicked up a storm and got the movie so caught up in red tape that it'd be postponed indefinately, which is the death knell for any movie.

Originally posted by Blind-Enemy
that's not true ... Stan Lee doesnt have an opinion when it comes to the spider-man movies or any other marvel movies , all the rights belongs to marvel and sony so he wouldnt stopped it from being released 😬

Exactly.Some people like pr13 just dont get it though that marvel sold thier movie rights to sony and Stan has no control over what these movie companys do in making these films.If he hates something about what they are doing in the movie,he cant do nothing about it,Like I said,in his OWN words he said he has very little input at all in what sony does with these movies.some people just dont want to believe that though.

all the rights belongs to marvel and sony so he wouldnt stopped it from being released 😬 [/B][/QUOTE]

actually that should say-ALL rights belong to sony and marvel cant stop it from being released. 😉

with all the money he got for those rights, I'm sure he doesn't give a damn

😂

Please , stop the lies. Stan hated the organics, but he had to promote those stupid movies. Have you ever seen an actor, a director or an actress talking bad about the movie that they are promoting?

he didn't have to endorse the movie, it still would have made a bundle without his blessing.

if he was really against it he could have filed a lawsuit, which would get the release postponed, which would piss sony off big time, and really damaged the movie.

maybe he just didnt care one way or the other...

Originally posted by pr1983
he could have kicked up a storm and got the movie so caught up in red tape that it'd be postponed indefinately, which is the death knell for any movie.

postponed indefinately???

i dont think so ... Stan Lee isnt an authority in hollywood so woudlnt made a difference even if he wanted 😉

postponed indefinately???

i dont think so ... Stan Lee isnt an authority in hollywood so woudlnt made a difference even if he wanted

he doesn't have to be, you'd be surprised what a lawsuit can do...

Originally posted by Paola
with all the money he got for those rights, I'm sure he doesn't give a damn

Possibly. but thats something that we can only speculate on.Will never know for sure on that one or not.

Originally posted by Paola
with all the money he got for those rights, I'm sure he doesn't give a damn

the rights've belong to marvel since day one ... Stan Lee've never made a dime from anything marvel has done with any of the characters he has created

Originally posted by pr1983
he didn't have to endorse the movie, it still would have made a bundle without his blessing.

if he was really against it he could have filed a lawsuit, which would get the release postponed, which would piss sony off big time, and really damaged the movie.

maybe he just didnt care one way or the other...

actually , Stan Lee did endorse the movie ... i've seen it on several especials , but talking about the character in the comics never the character from the movie

Originally posted by pr1983
he doesn't have to be, you'd be surprised what a lawsuit can do...

it'd make no sense

actually , Stan Lee did endorse the movie ... i've seen it on several especials , but talking about the character in the comics never the character from the movie

i know he did, thats what i've been saying...

it'd make no sense

of course not, but it wouldn't stop him, spidey has his creation, if he was so against it he coulda done it...

i understand what you're trying to say , but the sad sad truth is that Stan Lee doesnt have any rights over ANY of the characters he created , marvel does

i know, i understand that, what i'm saying is nowadays anybody can sue over anything, and if stan really wanted to he could get major backing in a lawsuit.

people seem to be using stan as an excuse because they hate the movies...

Bottom line is that if Stan Lee had a "PROBLEM" with the films he would have never decided to write "Spider-Man: The Official Movie Adaptation" when he clearly wouldn't have if he disliked the films.

sony and marvel wont even ask him to do it

Originally posted by TheFilmProphet
Bottom line is that if Stan Lee had a "PROBLEM" with the films he would have never decided to write "Spider-Man: The Official Movie Adaptation" when he clearly wouldn't have if he disliked the films.

I knew I would regret it if I read one of your posts again but I just could not help it.Mindless false ramblings as always.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
Mindless false ramblings as always.

In your posts, yes. 😄

I have always imagined Stan Lee as an greedy old man. I mean, I would be if I was Stan Lee.

Originally posted by spider-venom
no he shouldn't, he has every right to speak his mind

Im sorry, but wouldn't one thread be enough for his mind? WOULDN'T COUPLE SENTENCES BE ENOUGH FOR IT?

"I-dont-like-Spider-Man-movies."

"The-movies-are-dumb-because-of-the-organics."

"That-is-why-I-gave-the-movies-an-funny-name-like-Man-Spider."

"It's-like-Spider-Man."

"Only-that-"man"-is-before-"spider"."

"Sony-is-stupid."

"I-am-only-true-Spider-Man-fan."

"Other's-are-just-a-bunch-of-Man-Spider-lovers."

"I-am-right."

"Others-are-wrong."