Spiderman movies suck

Im a fan of the movies and the comics (have been since a young age). My question is to the posters who dont like the organic webbing: We all know from the comics that web fluid is expensive so if the web shooters were used the whole story of Peter being broke is redundant. How can he afford to make the web fluid but not pay his rent? Also it nullifies the story of him losing his powers, if he had web shooters he could still function as Spidey (he just couldnt climb walls). I realise the organic webbings origin was SM-1 but thats a whole new argument. This is just a question, NOT an invitation to start a shit storm. Im not insulting your reasons for not liking the movie, mainly because i believe if we all liked the same movies the world be a far less interesting place. Im just curious to find out how the web shotters would have hindered the story of SM-2.

I thought it was cool that with the organics, he had a 'web failure.'
It was cool to see a hero plummet towards his death but luckily, survive.

I don't like the web-shooters because it's too 'fantasy like' When we all know that it's impossible for a teenager to create web-shooters and web fluid. I mean, come on people, this isn't 'The Twilight Zone.'

Mr Parker, Alpha & bakerboy... keep this topic as clean as possible. is the last time I ask you...

I haven't un-cleaned the topic at all.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
"Lets see, im sick too of see some people like black cat and alpha centaury trying to defend the undefendible. So, alpha centaury, are you trying to say that a hollywood actor cant prepare their part? So, what is your definition of hollywood actor? because i didnt understand your weird explanation of that."

Oh shut up you idiot. It's not the undefendable. I'm not DEFENDING Kirsten either, I'm saying that she prepared for her part as much as she, and apparantly Sam Raimi, thought was needed. She isn't used to playing parts like that. The nearest she came was playing Claudia in "Interview with the Vampire" and even then it was BASED on the book. Certain actors and actresses will prepare in different ways. She didn't have to be EXACTLY LIKE Mary Jane to act out the part she was given, she just had to be the woman in distress and eventual love interest of Parker/Spidey. Which she did. She did what she was told to do and did it well. Tobey wasn't exactly Parker, Alfred wasn't exactly Ock. They all played their roles as good as they NEEDED to for the movie. That's it. You don't like the movie for your own reasons, others like them for their own reasons. Just deal with it and stop acting like a pathetic little kid.

"So, what are you talking about? Kirstend is much capable of she did in the man spider movies, but the script was terrible and mixed mary janer character with gwen's."

Firstly, the movie is called "Spider-Man". Stop calling it Man-Spider, there's no excuse for ignorance. For everytime you call it Man-Spider I'm gonna call you BoyBaker, see how you like it. Secondly, the script wasn't terrible. Again you are expecting some best acting ever with flawless script and no faults whatsoever. Dude, it's Spider-Man. It's not Hamlet, it's not Macbeth. It's Spider-Man. That movie was maybe not the best that it could have been, but it sure as hell could have been so so so much worse. It's, in my opinion, a great movie. The second one I liked for the action and excitement, I think it floundered a bit at the end but besides that I think they're great. I respect that you don't like them, I don't understand why and I think the reasons for you not liking them are petty and pathetic. But I respect them nonetheless. Grow up and do the same.

"But they are such one of the worst evils on cinema story. "

Dude, go and watch "Catwoman". I'm a Spider-Man fan, I know a Catwoman fanatic. Let me speak for Spider-Man fans when I say we got a better deal. That is one of the most ridiculous claims ever. Spider-Man is not and never will be one of the worst evils in cinema history. That isn't down to opinion either.

"Please, and that is for alpha centaury, black cat and another man spider fans, when you post something, you should know what are you talking about , if not, you are only being and arrogant guy with his cheerleader"

All this coming from a guy who says everything that Mr.Parker and Endenkton says. Speaking of Kirsten Dunst, I'm surprised you three didn't beat her and Eliza Dushku out of their places in "Bring It On". You are the cheerleaders here.

How dare you call yourself a Spider-Man fan? You're nothing of the sort. You're a Spider-Man fanboy. You're a disgrace to Spider-Man fans.

-AC

He speaks the truth, jeez get over yourself, you can call it man spider in your bizzaro world where you masturbate all day but in reality it's spider-man. I can't believe people can actually flame that great movie, people just don't understand movies WILL NOT BE EXACTLY THE SAME AS COMICS.

Originally posted by bakerboy
Really, this alpha centaury guy is really pathetic. I can discuss with people like red superfly, because i respect him althought we arent agree in many issues, but he always respect the other who is discussing with him. Discuss with someone who is so full of ego and arrogance like this centaury guy, who is pride of his discussion skills and say things like he isnt in the level of the other who is discussing with him is really a waste of time. Go and watch yourself in your mirror, dude. Im sure that it what do you like more.

For the other guy question, Oviously, when a serious actor like tommy lee jones, with a serious and respected acting career of many years in cinema, tv and theatre take a so serious and tragic character like two face and play him like a histrionic clown, doesnt make sense. It should to be the idea from another people.

Please boybaker your just mad because he is just killing your aguements and his arguements make a lot more sense.

I'm neutral in this, after I read all these posts, people like Alpha make a lot of sense.

Spider-Man two's idea about Parker losing his powers when he did not believe in them was stupid. Otherwise, the movie was good.

when it got to that point ^ I truly believed it was time for the six-armed Spidey to show (as it did in the Animated series 😬)

Originally posted by DarkCrawler
Spider-Man two's idea about Parker losing his powers when he did not believe in them was stupid. Otherwise, the movie was good.

What do you mean lose his power when he did not believe in them? 😕

it was more to do with his emotional state, his belief in his powers was absolute... his broken heart on the other hand was the cause... either way it was dumb imo... there were a hundred other ways to show him being sad...

It wasn't just because of MJ.

He lost his powers from stress, his stress came from:

His relationship with Harry.
Wanting to tell Harry why his father was killed and who Peter really is.
His relationship with MJ.
MJ was getting married.
Wanting to confess to Aunt May about Uncle Ben.

Those were all the main reasons. It makes sense he lost his powers from stress, when a spider is stressed out it can't spin webs.

But at the end of the movie, all those problems are solved so.

Originally posted by BlackC@t
It makes sense he lost his powers from stress, when a spider is stressed out it can't spin webs.

😆 I agree with you, but I just found that really funny...

I'm going to start stressing out all the spiders in my pantry and basement so they'd stop making a silk forest down there...

So Spider-Man doesnt have stress when he fights against his enemies?

I would. If Spider-Man would have too, then he would lose his powers also everytime he fights against his enemies.

No, no, no.

His stress needs to be very high, it built up over a period of two years. Spidey fights a villain for a few weeks, not nearly enough stress.

It's emotional stress that causes it. He doesn't get emotional stress when he fights his enimies.

I guess that makes sense but it was still a good movie.