God or No God?

Started by AOR96 pages

http://www.doesgodexist.org/Phamplets/Mansproof.html

Originally posted by AOR
We have proof of his exsistance. Of all the people, I thought you would have known...

No we do not. If God exists, he needs to get his arse down here, and show himself. Then, we will have proof.

Originally posted by AOR
http://www.doesgodexist.org/Phamplets/Mansproof.html

Doesn't prove a thing. A whole lot of writing proves nothing. Where is the physical proof?

and that is a s bound to happen as Spurs will win the Premiere League which bounds to say mever

Originally posted by finti
and that is a s bound to happen as Spurs will win the Premiere League which bounds to say mever

What does this have to do with anything? 😮 🙁

as much as it has to do wit deities

Originally posted by finti
as much as it has to do wit deities

Right, I don't get it, but alright. 😉

Originally posted by debbiejo
No you don't...not of him being god either....People aren't sure...Inconclusive. 😄

No we have proof of his exsistance as in records of people knowing him:

Tacticus(c. 55-117):

Writing in his Annuals approximatly A.D. 115, the Roman historian Tacitus reports of the famous fire tha broke out in Rome under the reign of the corrupt and notorious Emperor Nero.

To suppress this rumor [that he had started the fire], Neor fabricated scapegoats and punished with every refinement the notoriously depraved Christians (as they were popularly called). Their originator, Christ, had been executed in Tiberius's reign by the governer of Judea, Pontius Pilate. But in spite of this temporary setback the deadly superstition had broken out afresh, not only in Judea (where the mischief had started) but even in Rome. All degraded and shameful practises collect and flourish in the capital.

This quote indicates that Tacticus likely checked official Roman records to compile his history. He is the only Roman historian to Mention Pontius Pilate, the two Jewish writers-Josephus and Philo-tell of Pilate's harsh rule in Judea. Tacitus verified that Jesus' public like took place during Emperor Tiberius's reign, an important fact also mentioned by the Evangelist Luke (Luke 3:1-2)

No one has seen God, I don't even think Jesus saw Him, just heard Him.

No he says he's seen him. What? How did that question come to relate...

Originally posted by AOR
No he says he's seen him. What? How did that question come to relate...

You said that there is proof of people knowing God, if people knew Him, they must have seen Him, and I didn't think God would show his face to anyone.

Originally posted by Makedde
You said that there is proof of people knowing God, if people knew Him, they must have seen Him, and I didn't think God would show his face to anyone.

I see the face of God every night, just go outside. 😉

Originally posted by Makedde
You said that there is proof of people knowing God, if people knew Him, they must have seen Him, and I didn't think God would show his face to anyone.

For God to show his face would kill people.....

so it is with certain women too

But you die instantly, and of utter aw, where with women, I'm sure it's a little more painful...

you talk of experience?

How do you prove that the universe is real ? You do not prove it, you define it that way. Believing in God is not different of believing anything to be real. When someone prove something to you, then first you have to believe that the proof that was show means that the thing is real.

THE PROBLEM IS IN THE DEFINITION OF PROOF

Originally posted by Atlantis001
THE PROBLEM IS IN THE DEFINITION OF PROOF

This is the crux of the matter, what determines the difference between science and scientism, the difference between a fair and unfair consideration of scientific method.

God. And I believe in both.........God.... AND the evolutionary theory.

^^ That is actually very interesting. Many people, I've spoken to, tend to incorporate the two.