More credible, God or Bigfoot?

Started by Evil Dead5 pages

ooh......

copy/pasting from intenet sites are much easier than thinking eh?......ofcourse it is, you're a Christian! why think for yourself when you can copy/paste was somebody else says........

I must say though.......the whole copy/paste verses is a tiresome gimmick.........if this were Survivor, you'd already be kicked off.

What if your god is bigfoot? fear

Originally posted by Evil Dead
I've seen videos, pictures and even casts made from footprints supposedly of the sasquatch.

The closest thing I've seen to evidence of God was the movie "the Ten Commandments".......and they admitted it was a hoax. It wasn't real at all......it was all written and performed by actors.

Seems to me that with millions of followers who God constantly watches over and judges......whom he loves........he would let atleast one of them take a picture at some point in time.........if not for proof then just for a cool momento for one of his fans to put on their mantle.

Hmmm, I think my God is far more credible than Bigfoot. Your idea of God is limited to what Bible, Torah and Qur'an have to say, which I feel is rather weak - much like all those who follow those religions.

My idea of God is Universe, and everything in it. I don't need to prove my God, I am one, and so is everyone and everything around me. I see it and I exist as it. Far more credible than bigfoot.

Hmmm, I think my God is far more credible than Bigfoot. Your idea of God is limited to what Bible, Torah and Qur'an have to say, which I feel is rather weak - much like all those who follow those religions.

My idea of God is Universe, and everything in it. I don't need to prove my God, I am one, and so is everyone and everything around me. I see it and I exist as it. Far more credible than bigfoot.

a god is a diety, by very definition. We already have words for our unvierse and yourself.........they are "universe" and "yourself".......

Originally posted by Evil Dead
a god is a diety, by very definition. We already have words for our unvierse and yourself.........they are "universe" and "yourself".......

Not true.

Maybe in the ''west'' God is defined in your terms. In 'Easern religions' and Paganism, it most certainly is not.

More credible, God or Bigfoot?

Bigfoot, however Bigfoot is part of God, but I cannot prove that. So, Bigfoot it is.

word. there are pictures of bigfoot......plaster casts made of footprints.....hairs..etc. No pictures of the god inside lilbitch's head.....

Originally posted by Evil Dead
word. there are pictures of bigfoot......plaster casts made of footprints.....hairs..etc. No pictures of the god inside lilbitch's head.....

Here is a photo of god. 😆

Originally posted by Evil Dead
copy/pasting from intenet sites are much easier than thinking eh?......ofcourse it is, you're a Christian! why think for yourself when you can copy/paste was somebody else says........

😆 😆 😆 😆 😆

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Here is a photo of god. 😆

😆 😆 😆 😆 😆

Originally posted by lil bitchiness
Hmmm, I think my God is far more credible than Bigfoot. Your idea of God is limited to what Bible, Torah and Qur'an have to say, which I feel is rather weak - much like all those who follow those religions.

My idea of God is Universe, and everything in it. I don't need to prove my God, I am one, and so is everyone and everything around me. I see it and I exist as it. Far more credible than bigfoot.

😆 😆 😆 😆 😆

from an empirical point of view, Neither is credible. From other points of view?

Witnesses:

God - Most eyewitness testimony is too old to be useful
Bigfoot - most eyewitness testimony is from dubious sources

physical proof:

God - Only his handiwork, which is not recognized as such by many
Bigfoot - abundant footprints, hair, and photographic evidence. Much of which has been debunked, which casts doubt on the rest.

God does have one advantage in this debate however. Many scientists disbelieve the Bigfoot thing because they find it unlikely that a large humanoid could live for so long with humans nearby without ever leaving a body. God doesn't have this disadvantage. He is supposed to be elusive by nature. His absence is much more explainable.

So, I'll give the credibility to God. I must add the caveat that sasquatch is much more scientifically provable.