No 'Q' For Bond 21?

Started by Clovie97 pages

it is very powerfel
and VERY not nice cry

hell yeah 😊

meanie cry

😛 on the second thought 😖hifty: it is good you're enlarging your wordshaft 👆

das ist toll 😊

ja, ich glaube es ist. 😊

Why is it that no threads on this forum continue with the topic? Every topic is pointless here now.

Originally posted by NoFate007
Why is it that no threads on this forum continue with the topic? Every topic is pointless here now.
because considering the number of ppl who post here it is kinda boring to be saying same things again and again.
but i don't understand why don't you instead of whining about thread being 'pointless' just write something nice about the topic.

(and btw for me it wasn't pointless, it was german 😖)

well, NoFate, you can always make an ontopic post... fact is: the script is still being worked on, so you can't make a definitive point in this yet

and i still think that cleese shouldn't be puted into the script 🥷

and I still disagree with ya

The reason I don't post here is cause in order to get to anything that has to do with Bond, I have to go through 20 pages of you two talking about random other things lol. I know the script is still in progress, but that didn't stop other forums from discussing things, like Episode III, all the comic book movies, etc. It just seems like it'd be easier for you two to exchange screen names on AIM and talk there.

Originally posted by yerssot
and I still disagree with ya
and i still don't understand why.

Originally posted by NoFate007
The reason I don't post here is cause in order to get to anything that has to do with Bond, I have to go through 20 pages of you two talking about random other things lol. I know the script is still in progress, but that didn't stop other forums from discussing things, like Episode III, all the comic book movies, etc. It just seems like it'd be easier for you two to exchange screen names on AIM and talk there.
sweetheart if we could talk on AIM i promise we would be talking there. but apparently we can't.
and i'm very sorry that you have to go through random stuff. 😕
but you as well are not saying anything on topic but comapring this place with Ep3 stuff. which doesn't make much sense to me 😕

Originally posted by Clovie
and i still don't understand why.

sweetheart if we could talk on AIM i promise we would be talking there. but apparently we can't.
and i'm very sorry that you have to go through random stuff. 😕
but you as well are not saying anything on topic but comapring this place with Ep3 stuff. which doesn't make much sense to me 😕

My 3 or so posts on this board doesn't measure up to yours, so don't even say its the same thing lol. Let's see if this works then...and when it doesn't, my point will be proven:

Q in Bond 21, what are the negative and positive aspects of it? Who would you like to see play Q if Cleese doesn't do it?

Begin.

that's not really a fair comparison yo make NF... EpIII got leaked (like all the previous star wars movies) so that every day you got new spoilers in. Every week there is a new comic out (DC, Marvel, Dark Horses,...) even religion has questions every day
But Bond... there is no news on who the new bond will be, the script isn't finished, they aren't shooting, ... in other words: bond is (currently) dead, so you can't fill 2 years with sensible talks, that's the problem. As soon as there will be filming and such, there WILL be a lot of ontopic talk of course, just not currently when the only offical things are that the movie will be named Casino Royal and that they'll shoot in Prague

and to be ontopic:
lets just have Cleese in it, he was in the last movies already so don't change that eventhough he can never measure up to Desmond.

exactly ✅

but i don't like cleese. and it is obvious that no actor will be so great as Q as Desmond was 🙁

why don't you like him? cause of his previous roles?

he seems not serious 🙁

it's the face huh?

and the way he talks 🙁

english? 😑