No 'Q' For Bond 21?

yes yes yes!!!
and you said that it is a bad idea
and that they' won't get two actors to play bond at the same time tongue12

I have no recollection of the event in question 😑

but for a bond movie it would be weird plus if they don't do it right it would be confusing (for the average moviegoer so then the movie won't make much) plus indeed, who will be the next bond then?

but I have schmoll you tend not to remember about a lot fo things 🙁

but why? for me it will be fun. they can make parts with young actor in sepia.

new fact in, old fact out 😛

but then he will be too young for the next movie, no?

so how can I know what is important enough for you to stay inside your memory weep

hmm...not necessarily..
if they take goran...they'll make him look a bit younger now,and before they'll be making next movie he'll be right age.

if it's related to food 😱

so they'll have to get him 😱

*throws cake at you* 😐

exactly 😊

is it with chocolate?

AND they have to get Cleese 😱

yes *throws some more* 😐

no. they don't.

well, it all depends on who they'll get as bond of course

why? 🤨
they can NOT have cleese no matter who is playing bond 😊

if they pick Pierce, they'll go back to the old script so he can join in

he is in the old script? 🤨

they made the old script for him remember?

for Pierce. not for Cleese.

but if Pierce can be in it, than they won't have a 28 year old Bond without the Q gadgets to start with!

so what? but there won't be cleese. he's ill.

he's recuperating

re-..what?

getting better