Daredevil vs. Wolverine

Started by 28Dave3732 pages

ok i guess your right.

Originally posted by Logan 87
You agree, or you trying to be funny ?

I just think its interesting, no hint at what "it" is...

how is that funny, lol no i agree.

wat?????

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
I just think its interesting, no hint at what "it" is...

Explain what that means. Its either a good thing that you think I have or a Bad thought in your head. Just say it, I would like to know, and yuou wonder why I assume, because its not clear. I could take that 2 ways.

OMFG here we go again.......

me and iron carnage will stay out of this . LOGAN THIS IS NOW BETWEEN you and CM ok?

I actually think that Wolverine would win.

He would, thats obvious. Painfully obvious.

Finally, some one agrees.

rifleriflerifleriflerifleriflerifle

riflerifleriflerifleriflerifleriflerifle

Only thing Daredevil has to worry about is Wolverine's healing factor.

Daredevil would put Wolverine down. Problem is Wolverine gets back up.

Thats the problem, maybe a billy club in the throat?

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
Thats the problem, maybe a billy club in the throat?

Daredevil has more than just billy clubs at his disposal; he's proficient with Elektra's sais as well, for example.

Let the fanboys tell it Wolverine instantly recovers from anything short of a decapitation (wrong) -- how long did it take him to recover after Marrow shoved that bone through his throat?

Oh my bad -- bad writing, right?

With battles involving Wolverine it would probably help to specify whether or not they are fighting to the death because his healing factor will prolong fights (how long was his fight against Omega Red, for example?).

Daredevil is quicker and much more agile than Wolverine could ever dream of being. But could he kill him? Yeah, but only under very certain conditions in my opinion. Could he drop him (erm, again)? Yeah.

Originally posted by Never
Daredevil has more than just billy clubs at his disposal; he's proficient with Elektra's sais as well, for example.

Understood

Originally posted by Never
Let the fanboys tell it Wolverine instantly recovers from anything short of a decapitation (wrong) -- how long did it take him to recover after Marrow shoved that bone through his throat?

Understood, but you also know they're going to use wolvie superfeats.

Originally posted by Never
Oh my bad -- bad writing, right?

look above

Originally posted by Never
With battles involving Wolverine it would probably help to specify whether or not they are fighting to the death because his healing factor will prolong fights (how long was his fight against Omega Red, for example?).

Yes I understand, but isn't it blood-

wait thats not the same thing.

Originally posted by Never
Daredevil is quicker and much more agile than Wolverine could ever dream of being. But could he kill him? Yeah, but only under very certain conditions in my opinion. Could he drop him (erm, again)? Yeah.

People say wolveirne's as fast as spiderman, good luck convincing them. 😉

He CAN beat him, but I've heard wolverine being exxagerated so much to the point,of healing behind machine gun fire.-

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
People say wolveirne's as fast as spiderman, good luck convincing them. 😉

That's the crappiest statement I've ever heard here (I've heard it before). Wolverine is neither as fast nor as quick as Spiderman. Someone once said Wolverine "dodged gunfire." So have I. What's the point?

Humans err. Moving targets are much more difficult to hit. Spiderman dodges bullets that WOULD hit him AFTER they've been fired (as in he's simply not there anymore). That's way different than my aiming at Wolverine and firing at a spot where he USED to be due to my inexperience as a gunman.

Yet people interpret that as "dodging bullets."

Let Wolverine consistently -- in every comic book in which he appears -- trash opponents without getting touched. Of course Spiderman can't do that every battle; it would make for boring writing.

Then come talk to me.

Originally posted by Never
That's the crappiest statement I've ever heard here (I've heard it before). Wolverine is neither as fast nor as quick as Spiderman. Someone once said Wolverine "dodged gunfire." So have I. What's the point?

Humans err. Moving targets are much more difficult to hit. Spiderman dodges bullets that WOULD hit him AFTER they've been fired (as in he's simply not there anymore). That's way different than my aiming at Wolverine and firing at a spot where he USED to be due to my inexperience as a gunman.

Yet people interpret that as "dodging bullets."

Let Wolverine consistently -- in every comic book in which he appears -- trash opponents without getting touched. Of course Spiderman can't do that every battle; it would make for boring writing.

Then come talk to me.

And herein lies the problem.

A misleading pic was put up to support evidence, wolverine moved faster than the eye can see, when the gunman fired, and sliced his gun in half, before he reacted.

See why this gets so counterproductive sometimes?

I know he can't move faster than the eye can see, but some insist he can against the new and improved dock ock.

"He will slice off the tentacles before ock reacts"

How? Last I checked the tentacles gave peter problems, and SHOULD be faster than wolveirne.

This is quite a good match up in my opinion................

Hmmmm