2005,the new year of horror?

Started by Cinemaddiction3 pages

Yeah, Horror Forums are like the steel cage of KMC, lol. We're a pretty motley crew.

Im not good enough for the horror forums

Ill go hang with the nerds

*goes to star wars forums*

haha, that comment is good enough to let you stay.

There are my favorites. Remeber this is solely based on opinion.

Good 2002 Horror releases:
28 Days Later (Yes it was out in 2002)
Resident Evil

Good 2003 Horror releases:
...Underworld is about it.

Good 2004 Horror releases:
Resident Evil: Apocalypse
Dawn of the Dead
AVP (Don't flame me)

Good 2005 Horror releases:
Land of the Dead looks promising
...the rest look retarded.
Oh, and King Kong. That is planned for this year, right? 😕

😄

Retarded?If the Resident Evil franchise is on your list then you shouldnt have a problem.

Originally posted by Cinemaddiction
Yeah, Horror Forums are like the steel cage of KMC, lol. We're a pretty motley crew.
And how I Adore it 😍

Originally posted by Beastro
Retarded?If the Resident Evil franchise is on your list then you shouldnt have a problem.

Let's play nice, boys. Austin, don't bother responding.

2005 the year for horror? Maybe of the 2000's!

HEY!!! House of a 1000 Corpses 2: The Devil's Rejects

It's coming out August 12th, 2005

YEAH!!!

Originally posted by Cinemaddiction
Let's play nice, boys. Austin, don't bother responding.

😉 Wasn't gonna waste my good use of words.

You already wasted good words by putting them on your list.

Originally posted by RavenNightstar
HEY!!! House of a 1000 Corpses 2: The Devil's Rejects

It's coming out August 12th, 2005

YEAH!!!

And thats good why?

Originally posted by RavenNightstar
HEY!!! House of a 1000 Corpses 2: The Devil's Rejects

It's coming out August 12th, 2005

YEAH!!!

😱 😆 Your hilarious.

dunno, i didn't really like House of 1000 Corpses... seemed so irrelevant

That term IRRELEVANT wasnt good enough to describe how horrible it was.Try again.

ooops. sorry. actually, i think its the best word for how i feel about it. and your the first person whos said "sorry mate, not harsh enough, beef it up." champion!

I dont think I ever talked like an englishman 😮

Originally posted by Beastro
That term IRRELEVANT wasnt good enough to describe how horrible it was.Try again.

Irrelevant isn't a descriptive term, if anything, James' point is that there was no house with 1,000 corpses in it, and it was basically a title ploy, like "Gothika", to make you think it was a spooky film, when it wasn't.

"House" was a 90 minute Rob Zombie music video with bits of TCM "homages".

I know what it means and it wasnt a good way to describe how bad it was.Seeing as how she did think it was bad.

"i didn't really like House of 1000 Corpses"

i'm a he. my names James. dont worry, lots of people thought i was a chick. and i agree with C-Dic, the movie didn't explain heaps of things, random things happened without any apparent reason, its just like Rob Zombie wanted to make a video with a list of things in it and poorly linked them together to make a feature film

Crosses her arms, and pouts🙁

Well I liked it! Granted, it wasn't really a horror movie, and there were cheap shots in it, but I liked it because it was different than what everyone else was doing at the time! Oh well, that's just me! 😉