conspiracy theorists

Started by dean78797 pages

Originally posted by Ushgarak
There is tons of it, from investigations all over the world. Every lead points towards it. And the amount of totally unreasonable things that would have to happen for your theory to be true makes it totally untabable.

You want to know why people look down on conspiracy theorists? You've shown your own point- it is because you talk so much outright crud, and then think by saying "You cannot prove everything you know is not wrong and that it is actually this way" is an even vaguely intellectual justifcation for such hogwash.

Fact is. the established situation is that Al-Qaeda attacked the US with three planes on 9/11. Now, as I say, either produce evidence to challenge that and make out the US organised it against itself (and for some reason did not use a plane on the Pentagon but then tried to tell everyone it was a plane... such gibberish...), or you have NOTHING.

am i a conspiracy theorist?
i bring up the the conspiracy...i never say in believed any of it..i just think they could create a good and decent discussion on these forums....where do u get your facts from huh? oh i forgot..silly me
and there are facts on this conspiracy if you read up on them...its whether u wanna take those facts on board or dismiss them entirely..thats up to you

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Questioning things is good.

Questioning everything for the sake of it is stupid.

-AC

for the sake of what?
questioning everything? like?

Originally posted by finti
to quote yourself, bring in hard evidence with the question. Not some written thing a lunatic cocked up when on heavy drugs. But plausible things that can hold water. That can be argued on a sensible level

how can i bring in evidence when u say that it is written by a lunitic cocked up on drugs?
so theres no point is there?

Originally posted by dean7879
am i a conspiracy theorist?
i bring up the the conspiracy...i never say in believed any of it..i just think they could create a good and decent discussion on these forums....where do u get your facts from huh? oh i forgot..silly me
and there are facts on this conspiracy if you read up on them...its whether u wanna take those facts on board or dismiss them entirely..thats up to you

I've read the so-called facts and they are all nonsense. People making something out of nothing to try and prove something that secretly pleases them.

It is clear that you think there could be something to that conspiracy, which is not a tenable position.

And there is absolutely no evidence at all that this was a set-up by the US, which is a monstrous and idiotic thing to think.

The whole idea is utterly stupid and no intelligent person should have to give rubbish like this a second thought. It is like we have decided to give up living in a time where common sense and rational thought actually matter, and the credibility of conspiracy theorists is destroyed by such things.

how can i bring in evidence when u say that it is written by a lunitic cocked up on drugs?
because if there where evidence it would have surfaced in the press, and dont come with that lame ass BS of the press being run by Illuminati and that such infop would have been prevented. Dan Brown might write good storys, but all his books are being ripped appart when further investigated

the press IS controlled finti...if THEY dont want the public to know anythin...then WE aint gonna know...its simple

Evidence of Explosives In The World Trade Center Twin Tower Collapses.

The evidence that the World Trade Center towers were demolished is compelling. Photographs of explosives detonating during the collapse of both the north and south towers are presented below. They are taken from two (publicly available) videos of the collapses. Each frame has been numbered by its position in the video. Both videos were filmed at 30 frames per second, so an eight frame interval covers about one quarter of a second.

Prove it.

Err... those are pics of the towers falling... what in the name of sanity is that meant to show?

have u got eyes?
can u read ?

http://www.threeworldwars.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=99

decent presented info^

"the press IS controlled finti...if THEY dont want the public to know anythin...then WE aint gonna know...its simple"

Talk about stealing words.

-AC

Yes, I have eyes, and they tell me that those photos show nothing at all! You're just stuck on the train of total pointlessness!

stealin words?

The first thing to note, is that the top section itself must be disintegrating, otherwise (as the above frames show) the top section would have extended far into parts of the building that are clearly, as yet, unaffected by the collapse.

But what could possibly cause the top section to disintegrate? And in fact, what could possibly cause the top section to almost entirely disintegrate, before the lower section begins to collapse?

You have to realize that most of the top section had not been affected by the aircraft strike or fires and was thus still the same immensely strong structure that had supported the building for some 30 years. If this section was going to fall at all, this section would fall as one piece (like a tree in the forest). Unless, of course, this section had been laced with explosives and was undergoing a controlled demolition of its own, just a few moments before the lower part of the building was demolished.

the press IS controlled finti...if THEY dont want the public to know anythin...then WE aint gonna know...its simple
to many independet media out there to let that happen, as for Norway they cant keep a thing out of the press. They get a hold on everything, it is even on the brink that the press is actually a national security threath

Oh come on.

I mean the Pentagon thing is one thing and people believe whatever but to say that it's a possibility that the WTC event was controlled demolition is the most ridiculous thing ever.

-AC

I cannot believe the architectural collapse of the Towers is somehow being used as evidence of conspiracy. Considerable- and far more intellectual- public inquiries as to why the Towers have been collapsed- aside from anything else, the basic design had flaws in. The metal structure melted and the rest could not stand. Not even Bin Laden expected that much to happen, but that fact is, the flaw was there and that is what happened.

Nothing you are posting is proving anything, Dean. And the totality of what you are trying to support is still untenable. You can only continue to sacrifice your own credibility by trying to propose such outlandish nonsense.

and as for TWC, it was the heat after impact that actually brought down the towers. The bearing beams at the levels hit buckled under the heat the fire caused and the domino effect that break down created crumbled the towers. The affect was more than the terrorist ever could have hoped for