"Well, I've got news for you: my philosophy has been published in 5 countries around Europe, USA, and South Africa and it's been acclaimed to have revolutionary concepts by many critics."
I'm genuinely (no sarcasm) interested in seeing these acclaims and approved revolutionary concepts.
Yes he mentioned that, Backfire. To me, being a teacher doesn't equate to being smarter than someone who isn't a teacher. I've been smarter than a great deal of my teachers as I'm sure anyone of high learning capacity and perception has been or is capable of doing.
Academic knowledge means nothing next to broad and extensive general knowledge.
Don't get me wrong he may very well be an extremely intelligent person, I'm not calling the man dumb. I'm above name calling (idiot, for example) but I don't agree with the way he puts himself across. I have the right to say that. Calling me an idiot coz I think he comes across as being pretentious isn't called for. Labelling me as "lacking intelligent capacity" and not understanding a philosopher because I don't agree with him or bow down to him, isn't acceptable to me. People call me arrogant and stuff on these forums, I don't insult them. There's simply no need.
From my experience teachers and professors of a high level are unbelievably arrogant anyway. If you're a genius (still don't understand your simple spelling mistakes and punctuation errors mind) then that's cool to be proud or even arrogant, however when you over complicate things that can be quite easily simplified, then accuse those who don't understand of being idiots, rather than SHARING your philosophy and indeed teaching it, as your profession title implies you should, then I think you're quite a pompous person.
-AC