The 2004 Razzies

Started by botankus2 pages

The 2004 Razzies

Here are the nominees (listed by movies) for the worst in cinema for 2004, and I think they're pretty good choices, especially Catwoman:

NOMINATIONS PER PICTURE

CATWOMAN = 7 (Picture, Actress, Supporting Actor, Supporting Actress, Couple, Director, Screenplay)

ALEXANDER = 6 (Picture, Actor, Actress, Supporting Actor, Director, Screenplay)

WHITE CHICKS = 5 (Picture, Actress, Director, Couple, Screenplay)

FAHRENHEIT 9/11 = 5 (Actor, Couple, Supporting Actor, Supporting Actress 2x)

SUPERBABIES = 4 (Picture, Supporting Actor, Director, Screenplay)

SURVIVING CHRISTMAS = 3 (Picture, Actor, Screenplay)

JERSEY GIRL = 3 (Actor, Supporting Actress, Couple)

AROUND THE WORLD IN 80 DAZE = 2 (Supporting Actor, Remake or Sequel)

EXORCIST 4: THE BEGNINNING = 2 (Director, Remake or Sequel)

NEW YORK MINUTE = 2 (Actress, Couple)

STARSKY & HUTCH = 2 (Actor, Supporting Actress)

Re: The 2004 Razzies

Catwoman has my nomination in every subject. Seriously, I was dragged along to see that piece of ****.

White Chicks and Catwoman deserve everything.

I thought exorcist deserved more razzies.. but thats cuz I havent seen catwoman lol

Don't count out Superbabies, it's my sleeper pick.

I was pushing pretty hard for Hildago, but apparantly the Association didn't listen to me. I'll take Alexander, though.

I'm suprised STARSKY & HUTCH got on the list, it was mildly entertaining, and it's kinda odd to nominate actors when they were supposed to be acting "campy".

Other than that Catwoman and Alexander should walk away with this competition.

Catwoman deserves an award for being the worst movie ever.Then "White Chicks"JM

spider-man two gives it a run for its money.I know you agree with me on that.

Nobody respond to the last post, if you do, the thread's getting shut down. Call it preventitive maintenance, lol.

No Van Helsing? I lost my faith on the Razzies.

Van Helsing maybe have been a stupid movie, but it wasn't horrible

Originally posted by Cinemaddiction
Nobody respond to the last post, if you do, the thread's getting shut down. Call it preventitive maintenance, lol.

lol, Nice call. I was about to start an argument.

Van Helsing was very stupid, but not on the level of Catwoman. And Spider-Man 2, with all it's faults, is lightyears ahead of those other movies.

Yeah, I think Van Helsing has been bash enought already. That atrocitie of Catwoman with Halle Berry shall forever be comdemn.

catwoman thnk godthats on there

Personally I hate the spiderman movies too, but I ve heard catwoman is really bad, most superheor movies are bad except for Hellboy and maybe daredevil, x-men , the hulk and all that crowd reek of shi#te 🥷

Originally posted by WindDancer
No Van Helsing? I lost my faith on the Razzies.

Van Helsing did get 1:
WORST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTRESS IN A LEADING ROLE
Kate Beckinsale (Van Helsing)

The Whole Ten Yards better get worse sequel.

i wouldnt dream of seeing White Chicks

I actually liked Jersey Girl in_love

Originally posted by Morning_Glory

I actually liked Jersey Girl in_love

I heard the first half is pretty good but then it gets mushy (kind of like Chasing Amy).