The 2004 Razzies

Started by Soth2 pages

Originally posted by Myth
Van Helsing did get 1:
WORST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTRESS IN A LEADING ROLE
Kate Beckinsale (Van Helsing)

The accent sucked, but other than that, she was good...

Spider-Man 2 is a good film. I guess people are entitled to there own opinion. I also love these superhero movies Hellboy, Daredevil: Directors Cut, X-men 1 & 2,Superman 1 & 2,Batman 1-3,The Shadow, Constantine looks pretty damn good, Blade 1 & 2,Batman:The Movie (1966),Men In Black 1 & 2,Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (1),& Barbarella.

There could've been more but I can't remember the rest I saw.

You're literally one of the few people that has mentioned MIB as being a comic book movie. Thank you VERY much.

You're Welcome.

Originally posted by papabeard
Personally I hate the spiderman movies too, but I ve heard catwoman is really bad, most superheor movies are bad except for Hellboy and maybe daredevil, x-men , the hulk and all that crowd reek of shi#te 🥷

Now I want to see Van Helsing just to see how bad it is!!!

Originally posted by Soth
The accent sucked, but other than that, she was good...

Worse accent is a separate category. I'm glad Brad Pitt got nominated for his bad accent in Troy.

wht bout angelina jolie's accent in alexander.. tht alone didnt make me wanna c the movie

Van Helsing is awful. I can't imagine anything being worse than that. Such a pity too cuz i loved the Mummy films.

someone should be murdered for super babies. Bruckhiemer should be banned from filmaking for national treasure. Out of those two, i would say the entire razzie catagory should go to both as a tie. Catwoman was bad, but it was a comic adaptation about a character that never even had an independant comic, atleast not very long. what did everyone expect? White chiks was terrible, but not as bad as the other comedies in the 99 cent barrel of failed comedies. the premise was one that was bound to be done to. there is no exscuse for superbabies and national treasure though, none what so ever.