Bashar Teg's (and Queeq's) KOROVA BLUE MILK BAR

Originally posted by Nactous
As for "global warming", its a theory. Just like religion, no one is making you believe it, its your choice.

Suuuuuuuureeee... keep on dreaming.

Originally posted by queeq
Suuuuuuuureeee... keep on dreaming.

Is it not a theory?

Originally posted by Nactous
Like it or not but Clinton was a great/better President.

As for "global warming", its a theory. Just like religion, no one is making you believe it, its your choice. And some people defend it, do they not? Some people could easily go around saying. "There is more proof to global warming's existence then there is of Jesus Christ's."

I see you have been fooled too.

Remember Global Cooling in the 60's and 70's? Wonder what's next?You know, CO2 doesn't lead temp... it's the other way around.

And before you go citing Bush's war on Iraq on me, do some homework. Bush invaded Iraq on intelligence from 3 different countries. America, England, and Russia all said that Sadam was building WMD's. Granted the intelligene turned out to be wrong, but what is Bush supposed to do? Think of what would have happened if it turned out to be true and Bush didn't act.

And as far as staying in Iraq untill we can stabalize it, because I know that's the next usual attack, Remember the whole Charlie Wilson thing? Got weapons to Afganastan so that they would be able to fight off the Soviets, but the american government, against Charlie's advice pulled out and left the Afgan's to themself. You know what happened? The Taliban came in, took over and here we are. Same thing will happen if we pull out of Iraq now. Mark my words.

Originally posted by THE JLRTENJAC
I see you have been fooled too.

Remember Global Cooling in the 60's and 70's? Wonder what's next?You know, CO2 doesn't lead temp... it's the other way around.

And before you go citing Bush's war on Iraq on me, do some homework. Bush invaded Iraq on intelligence from 3 different countries. America, England, and Russia all said that Sadam was building WMD's. Granted the intelligene turned out to be wrong, but what is Bush supposed to do? Think of what would have happened if it turned out to be true and Bush didn't act.

You know as much as I do, it was all about the oil.

Originally posted by Nactous
*Looks for Jac response*
Uh-hu....that's what I thought!!

its called i had to write an anyalisys

Originally posted by Nactous
Classic case of "Theyre were all doing it officer." 😉

You know as much as I do, it was all about the oil.

no

(BTW sorry for the multi-posts, I have to type while the professor isn't looking at me.)

I mean really, how many other countries have nukes?

Just because other countries may not have nukes, doesn't mean Iraq they couldn't have or wouldn't have.

Originally posted by Nactous
Classic case of "Theyre were all doing it officer." 😉

No, Being at an illegal under-age debauched party is a "They were all doing it officer" case.

Oh please, he wanted to finish what his father started. 😛

Spoken like Michael Moore.

Uhhu, and have you even seen 'Fahrenheit 9/11'?

What you mean this one?

In this film, muckraker Michael Moore turns his eye on George W. Bush and his War on Terrorism agenda. He illustrates his argument about how this failed businessman with deep connections to the royal house of Saud of Saudia Arabia and the Bin Ladins got elected on fraudulent circumstances and proceeded to blunder through his duties while ignoring warnings of the looming betrayal by his foreign partners. When that treachery hits with the 9/11 attacks, Moore explains how Bush failed to take immediate action to defend his nation, only to later cynically manipulate it to serve his wealthy backers' corrupt ambitions. Through facts, footage and interviews, Moore illustrates his contention of how Bush and his cronies have gotten America into worse trouble than ever before and why Americans should not stand for it.

No

There you go again, using someone else opinions/synopsis to formulate your argument. Whats wrong, not permitted to think for yourself?

Actually, I just pulled up Google, typed in Farenheit 9/11, clicked on the first site, and copied the synopsys. Just wanted a synopsys in my post.

But seriously, Jones....

I have something for you to see.....

Originally posted by THE JLRTENJAC
I see you have been fooled too.

Remember Global Cooling in the 60's and 70's? Wonder what's next?You know, CO2 doesn't lead temp... it's the other way around.

And before you go citing Bush's war on Iraq on me, do some homework. Bush invaded Iraq on intelligence from 3 different countries. America, England, and Russia all said that Sadam was building WMD's. Granted the intelligene turned out to be wrong, but what is Bush supposed to do? Think of what would have happened if it turned out to be true and Bush didn't act.

And as far as staying in Iraq untill we can stabalize it, because I know that's the next usual attack, Remember the whole Charlie Wilson thing? Got weapons to Afganastan so that they would be able to fight off the Soviets, but the american government, against Charlie's advice pulled out and left the Afgan's to themself. You know what happened? The Taliban came in, took over and here we are. Same thing will happen if we pull out of Iraq now. Mark my words.

Well said.

Originally posted by Nactous
Classic case of "Theyre were all doing it officer." 😉

You know as much as I do, it was all about the oil.

All about the oil? Is that why oil production is lower in Iraq and prices generally rise here in the US? Please...

And lets please keep Michael Moore out of this...he is a great filmmaker, very entertaining, but he is bias.

Originally posted by sweersa
Well said.

All about the oil? Is that why oil production is lower in Iraq and prices generally rise here in the US? Please...

Do you know how much oil is per gallon down there?

Originally posted by Nactous
Do you know how much oil is per gallon down there?

Doesn't matter. What matters is here and the fact that oil production is lower in Iraq.

Because they have so much of it...