Originally posted by Sith Master X
You're right Queeq, Raimi is to blame in part, but Spider-Man 1 and 2 were perfect examples of what Raimi is capable of. There was no interference from the Studio on those ones.When Raimi took on Spider-Man 3, he said no to Venom, but the studio ended up forcing it on him. While Eddie Brock was written into the movie, Venom wasn't to appear until the very end, setting up a cliffhanger for the fourth movie. The studio was too hellbent on rushing Venom and getting their action figures made. I think Sam did the best he could all the plots and characters that were going on at the same time, but even the best director in the world can have a tough time trying to deliver a movie filled with script issues and plot holes, and the one thing Raimi doesn't have full control over is the script. He can make changes, but they have to be approved by the studio executives before he can enforce it on set.
The film industry is tricky. Directors are supposed to have final say, but it's the film's studio executives who can overrule the director, unless you're Lucas and own your own studio. Raimi wasn't approving the script for Spider-Man 4, and the studio execs wouldn't budge. Raimi gracefully walked away from the movie so that he wouldn't be responsible for another travesty AKA Spider-Man 3. I applaud Sam, but I'm not applauding Sony after they came out and said they would give Raimi more control, and went against their word.
Those are just my thoughts. 🙂
Oh yeah, I agree. But still, he could have taken out the sandman at least. Or say no to the project but he was prolly bound by contract. Still, it was a major disappointment and I hope it was so for Raimi as well. He made two wonderful Spidey that brought all my feelings I had a kid reading the comics.
I always felt that Spidey 3 should have been about closure with Green Goblin. Spidey 2 clearly hinted at that... stupid studios.