Secondary Mutation

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
[B]Well, I understand that you are a fan of Cyclops. I've never really focused too much energy on Cyclops, because he is a very stereotypical "leader" "good Guy" Boyscout" type of character. And I think he is exactly what he should be. But, James Marsden, while fun to look at, even behind the visor, did what was asked of him. So, I can understand any issues you have with Bryan Singer for scripting him the way he did.

i have issues with both... more with singer i suppose for casting marsden in the first place 😬

I agree, Wolverine isn't the only X-Man. And I also agree that too much attention was paid to him. But, the quote below is right. He is the most well known X-Man. Wolverine will get more butts in the seats than Cyclops or Magneto

true, but the comics (for the most part) and even the animated show gave a bit more balance (though they had a bigger time frame), still though, they could have done it if they had tried...

I assume you're also a Psylock fan.

what gave it away 😛

That's cool. And as for Colossus, you can't make too many characters a focal point in the movie, and we had both Iceman and Pyro to deal with in the second and a huge Rouge focus in the first one...along with the other characters that were in it. I assume that Colossus was introduced, much like Bobby in the first one, so that he could play a larger role in the next one. That way he can play a role and not have to be a new character, but rather a part of the established lore of the film. No extra time need be spent on him than has to be.

thats exactly what i mean... movie one: rogue and wolverine, movie two: rogue, wolverine, iceman and pyro...

pyro is a secondary character, always will be... it seemed a bit dumb to me... of course so was making iceman a child imo... but i do understand what you mean there and have a similar opinion myself...

And I personally wouldn't use the term "slick" to describe the production, as that implies some sort of dishonest effort. I think Bryan Singer did an excellent job of making this world plausible...relatable. And that is something that has to be considered when making a movie versus a cartoon movie...or publishing a comic book.

i didn't mean slick in a bad way, more of a polished way... well produced...

And I suppose that is my point in all of this. I wanted a franchise that was executed in a plausible and believable way so that I didn't walk out of the theater saying.." WOW!..this really should have been a cartoon movie..what a waste" I grew up reading the comic and watching the cartoons. But I wasn't interested in the same old thing. And I feel that Bryan Singer delivered what I was expecting. Like Cyclops said: "Would you prefer yellow spandex?" Well, no...I wouldn't. Who would believe such a thing? I couldn't swallow it, since it was supposed to be taking place in the real world.

oh i completely agree, it has to seem relatable and have at least some sense of reality...

BUT! All that being said, I respect your point of view. Cheers.

as do i respect yours 😄

as for the oscars? they are political...

all i know when logan starts crying ad huging cyk when jean dies is stupid. she gone boo hoo, that was so lame. in a comic he would of screamed something like noooooooooo or jeaaaannnnnnnnne. no shes gone an have his voice cracking that was stupid. movie wolvie and comic wolvie are two differnt caracters. what is this thread about again?

secondary mutations

night crawler, can opean portales and just punch or kick threw them.

night crawler opeans a portal behind some villian an cyke sends a blast threw it, would be sweet.

rouge could transfer absored powers. she touches magnito then transfers that power to wolvie and he goes nuts makeing him self fly around with his claws out slashing people up.

that rogue power would be cool. and i like the nightcrawler idea

that nighty idea is kool...and it seems like the next logical step...apart from literal shadow blending

Cable should be able to merge with machines and make himself bigger and more powerful for a secondary mutation.

i don't reALLY LIKE THAT IDEA- srry for the caps it got stuck on caps lock

lolz...i thinhk that merging with machines would be weird...especially since his biggest enemy is the tech-organic virus

aah sweet irony...

that's the thing...his SM would get rid of the Techno Virus..he could "talk to machines" absorb them make himself bigger and more powerful...and he could turn him self back...or something.

i still don't thnik it would bea good idea

okay...what if Forge could turn to stuff..he could "invent himself"

i rekon forge SM would be to createthings from his mind...so instaead of being able to build stuff...he could create wateva he wanted from like x-dimensional matter or sumtin like dat....great....now i've confused myself

that might be kinda cool- is there anything such as third mutations??

does it make sense that storm can do EMP'S now?? imo it does

yeeh...i storm doin natural EMPs works for me....in regards to third mutations...i think there are...i think ice man and beast have been through mroe than one mutation

nah Storm should learn magic like her ansestors...that way she could turn into weather and controll it as well

Originally posted by stormfront13
that might be kinda cool- is there anything such as third mutations??

no... secondary is bad enough...

Originally posted by stormfront13
does it make sense that storm can do EMP'S now?? imo it does

no it doesnt... there just giving her more powers...

well it makes sense to me- i just did some readin on them and a lot of sites said they are almost full electricity and storm has a kinda control over that- there is a lot of effects that you can do with lightning that she hasn't done yet and since lightning is an affect of the weather then it makes since imo

no, thats not what i mean...

nukes produce emp's... storm does not have that level of power...

my main point is that she doesnt need another power, shes powerful enough already...