Girl Banned From Year Book

Well why not Napalm?

Ignore Napalm.

He's just a rampant homophobe with nothing intelligent to say it seems.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Ignore Napalm.

He's just a rampant homophobe with nothing intelligent to say it seems.

-AC

And yet better than you In every way.

Come on if a guy wore a dress to the school nobody would let him in the yearbook it's the same thing

Originally posted by Corran
Yes, in Scotland and Ireland etc - what right do the Americans whose great-great grandfather may have been scottish got to wear a skirt and call it a kilt when they won't let the females wear trousers - how Draconian.

so in what culture do women wear tux's lol?
its a girl wearing mens clothes for a formal yearbook photo (regardless of whether dress codes were laid down, im damn sure people are led to assume its a formal occassion) and as such, it was removed...sexual orientation is besides the point. and it should be dealt with exactly the same way as if a guy wore a dress. they should be removed, because altho the clothes may be formal, by cross-dressing, you remove the formality

If theres 1000 kids at the school, and they all wear suitable clothing except 1 lesbian...why is it the schools fault when she's removed?

Originally posted by finti
if a guy wanna wear a dress let him, it is he who have to stand for that choice not the rest of the bunch

No, there should be a dress code. Or somebody might show up in nothing

well if they want to......let them

No, there should be a dress code. Or somebody might show up in nothing

Bardock, thats just stupid... and if i turned up in a nazi uniform and matching tasche? i should be allowed? - granted not everything people would wear would be offensive (nudity would...and also to some, crossdressing would)

but the point is, it was a formal occassion...regardless of set regulations, im pretty sure (as was with my yearbook photo) they would be told it was formal.

like i said....1000 (guess) people showed up for the picture, ONE was removed...thats not sexism, thats not homophobia, thats inappropriate clothing for a photo!

Originally posted by finti
as long as you say tux or dress whatever you chose you dont get people with nothing

Would you really want wierdos like that in your year book?

I don' t know what kind of tuxedo she wore but this:

is called a tuxedo and is perfectly appropriate for women to wear. I own a similar one.

Would you really want wierdos like that in your year book?

Originally posted by Storm
I don' t know what kind of tuxedo she wore but this:

is called a tuxedo and is perfectly appropriate for women to wear. I own a similar one.

yes but there wouldnt be a story in the paper if it was that kind of tuxedo lol

Originally posted by Storm
I don' t know what kind of tuxedo she wore but this:

is called a tuxedo and is perfectly appropriate for women to wear. I own a similar one.

I thought they were talking about a man's tux

True (and she looks good in it to) I still see this a serious violation of freedom to express yourself

Could be Napalm could also be a unisex or female tux, the article doesn't give enough clarification

If it was that kind of suit what was the problem?

but its not!
if i go to a funeral in a clown costume id expect to be removed...
thats not a breach of my rights, thats just common sense

if u crossdress at a formal school photo its the same sort've thing

Crossdress?

BANG! This thread just got blown way out of proportion.

It was a girl wearing a tux, not Lily Savage doing stand up.

-AC

if you go to a funeral in a clown costume then you would idd prolly be removed or atleast it would not appreciated by the relatives.

However there is IMO a big difference between something so emotionally charged as a funeral and something as common as a year book picture

(if you don't like to have it in your copy you can still put a sticker or something like that over it)

Originally posted by Napalm
If it was that kind of suit what was the problem?

True but one never knows until one has facts