Originally posted by tommy vercetti
i agree that his wisdom did increase over time but not his mastery of the force. if it really had he would be a lot better than say palpatine
thx for the agreement but read any other yoda vs palp fight and you'll see why he lost the fight and also mastery over the force doesnt make you a great warrior.
tommy boy u don't no what ur talkin about. a sith has the same power as a master how do u figure when maul was beat by a padawn
lol kyp would waste maul so fast he pretty much beat luke when he was a trainee (with alittle help from kun actually quite a bit but still he was chosen by kun who noes power when he sees it) and also even if maul hit him he could just heal himself like he did in champions of the force
Please...
Durron would defeat Maul. Not only that Durron had enough potential to throw Luke through an entire room when he was just testing it - he had also experienced the dark side under Exar Kun studying some Sith powers. Now he was (in JA times) strong enough to:
a) lift an spaceship out of the high gravitation of Yavin
b) nearly kill Luke Skywalker with a force lightning attack - at least he seperated Luke's spirit from his body.
Now we can just go by logic. Sidious was stronger than Maul. Sidious was not strong enough to kill or nearly kill Luke. Kyp Durron did so. Hmm...that makes me think that Kyp is > Sidious who is > Maul.
And I think we are talking about NJO Kyp here who would have gathered more than a decade of experience (lightsaber combat, force knowledge) since the Jedi Academy times.
Maul loses here.