i noe ive said this in other forums but i think harry doesnt need a wand to do magic......my proof: book 1, helps snake escape.....book 3, blows up his aunt and unlocks the closet under the stairs, and all without a wand. and the 6th book is suposse to have something to do with harry eyes and there power......i think thats how harry will bet voldemort...with his emotions as long as he wants something bad enough it will happen.
for those who have never seen fawlty towers its a sitcom...comedy series about a hotel manager and his wife who have to constantly put up with guests anooying guests....basically every episode basil is annoyed to hell about soething and keeps it in...then at the end he just loses it shouts...screams and everything
its so good 😉
john cleese is also in the monty python series and movies
Originally posted by sauron
no i think you will find that the role is going to a mr John Cleesebasil fawlty with a wand
i was just joking there but that would be some good casting! cos he is great when he is mad is old basil
Oh yeah then he can play two roles, and score twice the cash!!!
As he would be both voldy and nearly headless nick...
OR perhaps it will be revealed in book 6 that Nick is in reality Voldemort and he just makes people think that he is a ghost to spy on them!
or maybe not...
But all wizards and witches can do magic when they'r young without wands maybe harry can channel his magic without one....or through DD phoenix (it will be cool!!)
the theory that harry will kill voldemort with the sword wont work but he can try to kill him in book 6 with it....
1)rowling wont use magic and sword combined fighting so far in the book and she wont do it in book 6 it's too late
2)sword it's corney...everyone expact it because they can't use their wands
3)there is book 7 in the future....so if harry will use the sword in the next book she wouldnt do it again in book 7 because harry can't kill voldy in book 6