Originally posted by moviejunkie23I think the difference lies in the matter of consent. Sure you can say you think the animal "wants it" but until animals can verbally communicate it can't consent. Consent from both parties is what seperates sex from rape.
i am loving this thread
"Perhaps, but perhaps they are no more "messed up in the head" than homosexuals."
people became outraged at this person comment. Why do you all favor a female with a female or a man with a man saying its there sexual preferance and you shoudn't jusdge and in the next breath say how disgusting it is for a human to have sex with an animal.
You say that the gay person was born with what they have and should be accepted. What if someone has a natural inclanation to have sex with animals and then after finding a dog humping his leg decides to assist the dog. You will condemn this man as a sicko and then on the otherhand make an acception for two of the same sex organs to have intercourse? I don't understand the double standard here.
Most of you would find a person making homophobic comments to be in the wrong so why do you inflict phobic comments about another type of sexuality. I don't get it. Sounds like people like to pick and choose their social favorings by popular opinion if you ask me.
valid point afro....but did you know in allot of these cases the animal humps without any prodding or forsive coaxing? Or if a dog is masterbating on your leg do you think the dog minds if it masterbates on your hand?? I am not saying its right so don't get me wrong, I am saying people seem to be making an exception for unconventinal sexuality when it comes to homosexuals but not to those that perform beastiality. They will say "eewww gross" about an animal but if someone says "eeww gross" when in talking about man on man they are labeled haters.
About the verbal agreement animals do not possess the ability to communicate through verbal means but one could argue that when a naked woman is in front of a horse and the horse begins to have sex with her he is acting in consent, same with the leg humping dog i mentioned ealier.
I am not for the action by any means!!! I just think its odd people are so defensive when it comes to jusding homosexuality when people are attracted to the same sex, and then sudeenly its oohhh those sick perverts lets shoot them when it comes to another sexual act that is not conventinal male human on female human sex.
y are you reading so much into this ?
i dont condone this sort of behaviour but it happends, i think its sick ( the pictures are even worse) so what !?!!
if a dog wants to hump my leg...so be it its seen as normal doggy behaviour , if i ever wanted to hump a dogs leg...id get commited!
thers the difference!
Originally posted by Uneeklyconfusedthe fact the a dog has the IQ of a toddler (a smart one that is) verses a adult mind is the reason...we humans have more sense than a animal and should not abuse our power over them
y are you reading so much into this ?
i dont condone this sort of behaviour but it happends, i think its sick ( the pictures are even worse) so what !?!!if a dog wants to hump my leg...so be it its seen as normal doggy behaviour , if i ever wanted to hump a dogs leg...id get commited!
thers the difference!
no matter how sexy they are *meow*
Originally posted by Uneeklyconfused
y are you reading so much into this ?
i dont condone this sort of behaviour but it happends, i think its sick ( the pictures are even worse) so what !?!!if a dog wants to hump my leg...so be it its seen as normal doggy behaviour , if i ever wanted to hump a dogs leg...id get commited!
thers the difference!
I hear that if you do it with a dog, that that dog will always follow you around and it will be obvious to everyone around, cause his nose will always be probing...from your experience, do you find that true??
I can't believe I'm contributing to this...Maybe I need to go to bed now.
exactly debb, it doesn't make it "ok" persay at all
the question is to me if you DO decide one form of unconventinal sex outside of male human and female human is "ok" than how can you label others not "ok" if they don't infrindge on the rights of a human or animal.(presuming you agree with a person that acts in beastiality that says the animal is a willing participant)
I just don't like the double standards. You know their are many people that look down on Mormons that have a past history of having mutiple mating partners and then on the same token will say being gay is great. I don't get it.
Originally posted by moviejunkie23Yeah you have a valid point. I think the main point is that animals are stupid. That's why you can't have sex with them, they aren't smart enough to realize that it's dangerous and you can get diseases and such. I mean I'm not saying gay sex is "conventional," but ****ing animals is just disgusting.
valid point afro....but did you know in allot of these cases the animal humps without any prodding or forsive coaxing? Or if a dog is masterbating on your leg do you think the dog minds if it masterbates on your hand?? I am not saying its right so don't get me wrong, I am saying people seem to be making an exception for unconventinal sexuality when it comes to homosexuals but not to those that perform beastiality. They will say "eewww gross" about an animal but if someone says "eeww gross" when in talking about man on man they are labeled haters.
About the verbal agreement animals do not possess the ability to communicate through verbal means but one could argue that when a naked woman is in front of a horse and the horse begins to have sex with her he is acting in consent, same with the leg humping dog i mentioned ealier.
I am not for the action by any means!!! I just think its odd people are so defensive when it comes to jusding homosexuality when people are attracted to the same sex, and then sudeenly its oohhh those sick perverts lets shoot them when it comes to another sexual act that is not conventinal male human on female human sex.
"the fact the a dog has the IQ of a toddler (a smart one that is) verses a adult mind is the reason...we humans have more sense than a animal and should not abuse our power over them"------------
so do you conclude that training a drug sniffing dog is a form of slavery?
-------"A man's hairy butt is still a human butt...barely...depends on the
man really...like Robin Williams' which is probably as hairy as
a wolly mammoth's...but I digress
A man's hairy butt is still a human butt, but an animal's butt is a
whooole other game!"-----
common man the same could apply for a straight man saying...."she may not be attractive but hey she is a woman!!!" "But another sexual organ wwwwooowwww thats a different topic"