you dig so deep and if you where to just look around you you would see that there is no choice other than god for all who question these types of things go to ICR.org and read some articles and then talk about it until you have done that you are not informed to the point that you can be ready to argue about it
Originally posted by gp christ loves
you dig so deep and if you where to just look around you you would see that there is no choice other than god for all who question these types of things go to ICR.org and read some articles and then talk about it until you have done that you are not informed to the point that you can be ready to argue about it
Stephen J. Gould once said, "I suppose that apples might start to rise tomorrow, but the possibility does not merit equal time in physics classrooms." The same is true of Creationism.
Yes, that's a hasty generalization and you are judging them all. I happen to like the Assembly of God organization. What exactly made you think of them as"that group."because when you visit several diffeent churches within a denomination they can be refered to as a group.
You do realize that the water in the lake is pitch black and there are cave systems at the bottom?yeah its tricky to find Santa at the north pole too, nessie is a nice story.............for kids, but truth is that with the equipment they have today thers is no places left for it to hide.
Let me ask you this echuu, ever been to Loch Ness?
Originally posted by finti
because when you visit several diffeent churches within a denomination they can be refered to as a group.yeah its tricky to find Santa at the north pole too, nessie is a nice story.............for kids, but truth is that with the equipment they have today thers is no places left for it to hide.
Let me ask you this echuu, ever been to Loch Ness?
No no, I meant what did the churchs do to tick you off?
No i have never been to loch ness have you?
The information I gather from is from experts who have been there and have seen it first hand.
No no, I meant what did the churchs do to tick you off?I was really met with a load of ignorance from that church when I live din the states, they used me as an example of people of low moral simply because I was a Scandinavian. They did so before they ever met me, and when I encountered them on how many of them that actually had been to Scandinavia the aswer was none.
No i have never been to loch ness have you?yes I have
The information I gather from is from experts who have been there and have seen it first hand.you should ask yourself this: why is it that these experts failed to record their sitings onto film, after all these expert is driven by wanting to be believed for what they claim to have seen. Because their level of expertise will be in question if they can not produce proof
Re: Fruits Of The Spirit...Who Has Them??
Originally posted by debbiejo
Who would God say are His true followers???1. Christians who claim to be his followers or
2. Anyone who isn't a believer in Christ, but who do exhibit the fruits of the spirit.
THE FRUITS OF THE SPIRITS ARE.
Love, patience, self control, mercy, long suffering, humility, compassion, kindness, charity, not boastful, not delighting in evil,...etc...
His followers are christians but god being jewish the followers should be all jews instead so it is really hard to say who the the fruit of the spirts are.JM 😕
Originally posted by finti
I was really met with a load of ignorance from that church when I live din the states, they used me as an example of people of low moral simply because I was a Scandinavian. They did so before they ever met me, and when I encountered them on how many of them that actually had been to Scandinavia the aswer was none.yes I have
you should ask yourself this: why is it that these experts failed to record their sitings onto film, after all these expert is driven by wanting to be believed for what they claim to have seen. Because their level of expertise will be in question if they can not produce proof
Man that's gotta suck; srry bout that. I'm 25% Swede; 💃 I like Scandenavia!
Just because you are searching for something doesn't mean you will find it; even if you are the biggest expert in the world.
So since you have been to loch ness, what was it like? Was it different than what I said?
So since you have been to loch ness, what was it like? Was it different than what I saidyes and that just show you how exaggerated stuff are about it all. The water is nothing worse than any other lake, there is a certain string in the air about that place but tha is because of the myth that surrounds it. All in all it was a real disappointment
Just because you are searching for something doesn't mean you will find it; even if you are the biggest expert in the world.with the equipment they have today there is no excuse for not coming up with a final result for the search of nessie. The conclusion is actually clear, but out of respect of the local tourist industry that surrounds the area they dont wanna a publish it.
Originally posted by finti
I came with an argument that there is no god, and that argument dont need proof and it stands until proven wrong........which nobody on this planet is capable of doing
(But Adam won't say that about an argument against God.)
In which case I can point you to a number of Adam's posts where he says that the burden is upon those who wish to prove their point; one cannot prove a negation, etc., etc., etc.he doesnt have to , cause if you lot been bright enough to tie your own shoe you wouldnt take up this discussion/argument which you would loose soooooooooooooooooooo badly, it aint our fault you argue like a smuck cause the evidence at hand is for our benefit not yours
Originally posted by FeceMan
In which case I can point you to a number of Adam's posts where he says that the burden is upon those who wish to prove their point; one cannot prove a negation, etc., etc., etc.(But Adam won't say that about an argument against God.)
Rationally, one must assume that something does not exist unless there is material evidence that it does. Those who believe in the existence of God follow this rule in other instances but do not apply the same reasoning to the existence of God. For example, one does not believe in the existence of unicorns eventhough he cannot prove that no unicorns exist somewhere. In this sense, it is as pointless to argue that God does not exist as it is to argue that unicorns do not exist.
Originally posted by Echuu
Rational thinking and assumptions can't solve everything.
Irrational thinking does not solve anything.
Originally posted by Echuu
But a belief in God can be called faith.
A belief in God can be called a number of things.
Originally posted by Echuu
It takes just as much faith for me to believe in God and for someone else to not believe in God.
If there is no material evidence that something exists, it is rational to assume that it does not. Therefore, it takes no degree of faith to assume its non-existence.