Fruits Of The Spirit...Who Has Them??

Started by finti12 pages

God doesn't really need you to believe for Him to be real...or not.
yes god does, wthout it god is dead

he doesnt have to , cause if you lot been bright enough to tie your own shoe you wouldnt take up this discussion/argument which you would loose soooooooooooooooooooo badly, it aint our fault you argue like a smuck cause the evidence at hand is for our benefit not yours
and dami the smileis didnt work for me last night but 😄 😄 😱 should have been there.....now they are

You seem to think God needs us.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Irrational thinking does not solve anything.

A belief in God can be called a number of things.

If there is no material evidence that something exists, it is rational to assume that it does not. Therefore, it takes no degree of faith to assume its non-existence.

Did I ever say that irrational thinking solved anything?

I know that a belief in God can be called many things.

Yes it does; your having faith that your assumption is correct. Your assumption cannot be definitively proven, even if it is"rational" to think that way.

Adam I thought your belief,that you stated once, was that there could be a possibility of a god.

all gods are dependent on humans, gods need for human to believe in them if not they cease to exist

My God is NOT dependant on humans. Whether you believe or not in God, he will always exist, whether you acept him or not he will always rule, what you think does not matter.

Originally posted by finti
all gods are dependent on humans, gods need for human to believe in them if not they cease to exist

Where did you read that?? 😑

I was really met with a load of ignorance from that church when I live din the states, they used me as an example of people of low moral simply because I was a Scandinavian. They did so before they ever met me, and when I encountered them on how many of them that actually had been to Scandinavia the aswer was none.

look, i think u might just take people the wrong way. There is such a thing. Also i think u need to back off and accept other peoples opinions once instead of having a solo pitty party for yourself.FINTI

Where's the party.. Can I come?

paperbag3

Originally posted by Echuu
Yes it does; your having faith that your assumption is correct. Your assumption cannot be definitively proven, even if it is"rational" to think that way.

How many times must we go over this? A negation cannot be proven. You cannot prove that something does not exist, because if it does not exist, there would be no evidence of its existence, let alone its non-existence. Likewise, if there is no material evidence that something exists, it is reasonable to assume that it does not. There is no material evidence that leprechauns exist, and it requires no degree of faith on my part to not believe in their existence. "I suppose that apples might start to rise tomorrow, but the possibility does not merit equal time in physics classrooms."

"Fruits Of The Spirit...Who Has Them??"

All those Mexican Catholics that crossed the border illegally. That's how their supplying those little stands on the side of the highway.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
You cannot prove that something does not exist, because if it does not exist, there would be no evidence of its existence, let alone its non-existence.

Good then you can't prove that there isn't a God. We agree on something.

Mexican illegals

😆

"Come buy our fruit to enter paradise. If you sell fake IDs it's half off on everything."

Originally posted by Echuu
Good then you can't prove that there isn't a God. We agree on something.

The inability to prove a negation is not a fault of my argument, but the inability to prove an affirmative is certainly a fault of yours.

The inability of science to even CONSDIDER the existence of some supernatural being having influence with anything isn't my fault; or yours. There are some things that science, rational thinking, and logic can't solve, and I would hope you would agree with me on that.

Plus, what the heck are you talking about? YOU said,"You cannot prove that something does not exist." I was agreeing with you and not trying to make this pointless issue go on and on.

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
"Fruits Of The Spirit...Who Has Them??"

All those Mexican Catholics that crossed the border illegally. That's how their supplying those little stands on the side of the highway.


😆
The inability to prove a negation is not a fault of my argument, but the inability to prove an affirmative is certainly a fault of yours.

You: "Prove Christianity. I say it isn't correct and you haven't provided me any information that proves it."

Me: "Prove macroevolution. I say it isn't correct and you haven't provided me any information that proves it."

It is more like...

Originally posted by FeceMan
You: "Prove Christianity. I say it isn't correct and you haven't provided me any information that proves it."

Me: "Prove macroevolution. I say it isn't correct and you haven't provided me any information that proves it."

Me: "If it is your assertion that God exists, than prove it."

You: "I cannot prove that God exists, but you cannot prove that He does not."

Where did you read that
gods are man made, if man stop believing in them gods die

My God is NOT dependant on humans. Whether you believe or not in God, he will always exist, whether you acept him or not he will always rule, what you think does not matter.
in the real world where I live what the individual thinks does matter. I cant speak for religious la la land though, but your statement that what you think doesnt matter tells of a more of a mind controlling state. A state where you cant think for yourself cause you might stumble onto the truth and you cant have that cause that be the end of your religion

Not the God...It doesn't matter if you believe....Just like if don't believe the vacume cleaner is in the closet...If it's in there, then it is. We have no choice in whether it is or not.. Not believing in the vacume cleaner doesn't make it go away.....Though I know what your saying...

Of course he doesn't that why it's called the "Theory of Evolution".

Originally posted by PrinceofBlades
Of course he doesn't that why it's called the "Theory of Evolution".

Scientists and their crazy "theories". Like that one, the "Theory of Relativity," we all know that one is false.