You guys are not following - "nothingness" and "existence" are opposites, period. It doesn't make sense to talk of a relationship between the two. Empty space is also something, NOT nothingness - nothingess is the absence of being as such, there is only being - only "somethingness" - we cannot talk of nothingness, as being is all we have.
Empty space is not something because it implies nothingness, as the space would be empty (as in 'nothing there' or 'unoccupied'😉.. it may be occupied by smaller somethings, but not ALL of the space is occupied.. there may be very small gaps of nothingness, but there are most likely gaps none the less.. and I dont think they are talking about just an area around them.. they mean in any location in the universe.. and im sure in that retrospect there is a 'nothingness'
...zzz.....please god help me here........'nothingness' means nothing. In being/existence there cannot be nothingness, because then there will be an unbreachable gap in being. Space is NOT nothingess, space is still something, otherwise we won't be able to talk about it, duh! Being is solidly being - there is no place for nothingness, as that would be a logical contradiction
"where no matter exists .. nothing living anyway"
I think that's abit limiting the concept of nothingness. Being/existence does not only mean the existence of matter. I agree that there are open spaces where no matter exists, BUT we cannot say that there is nothingess wherever there is no matter. Where there is no matter, there can be something else - a something, but that something is not matter. What I mean by nothingness is the absence of any being or existence as such - non-existence in the most extreme and absolute sense. There are things beside matter, like anti-matter, quantum energy fields, etc.
Originally posted by space
I think we have a definition conflict here - how do you define 'nothingness"?
Exabyte, you have the right idea here - nothingness being:
"the absence of matter as well as the absence of above and below, of before and of after, of time and existance itself".
BUT I don't agree with:
"A nothingness as it, according to modern physics, 'exists' or just is 'outside' the universe or there were no universe is, a nothingness as it is assumed to have existed before the big bang"
I don't believe in the Big Bang, or any origin to existence for that matter - it's all infinite/eternal - no beginning, no end.
I think nothingness only exists in the minds of those who are already dead. But if they are dead they are not alive to see it. It can't be seen cause it's not even pitch black and when your dead you don't even see pitch black but if you didn't see even that then obviously it's inpossible to see which is why only dead people see it. It's just meant to be that in life there is no such thing as getting the experience of seeing nothing therefore you wouldn't be apart of life. iT's hard for me to explain.